ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Validation of a Neurophysiological-Based Wearable Device (Somfit) for the Assessment of Sleep in Athletes.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Consumer-oriented (wearable) sleep technology: a systematic SWOT analysis and recommendations for athletes and fitness enthusiasts.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2026Pooled it
- Article
- How Does the Sleep Regularity Questionnaire Relate to Wearable- and Diary-Derived Sleep Regularity?Journal of circadian rhythms · 2026Article
- Evaluating the performance of wearable EEG sleep monitoring devices: a meta-analysis approach.npj biomedical innovations · 2025Article
- Heavy Hitters, Light Sleepers: Collision Frequency and Locomotor Load on Sleep Architecture in Professional Rugby Union Players.European journal of sport science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The aim of the study was to examine the validity of a neurophysiological-based wearable device, i.e., Somfit (Compumedics Ltd.), for the assessment of sleep in athletes. Twenty-seven athletes (14 F, 13 M, aged 22.3 ± 5.1 years) spent a single night in a sleep laboratory. The participants had 9 h in bed (23:00-08:00) while fitted simultaneously with Somfit and polysomnography (PSG), i.e., the gold standard for the assessment of sleep. Somfit and PSG were used to independently categorise each 30-s epoch of time in bed into one of five states, i.e., wake, stage 1 non-REM sleep (N1), stage 2 non-REM sleep (N2), stage 3 non-REM sleep (N3), or REM sleep. There were large differences between participants in terms of the amount of Somfit data that were successfully captured/scored, so three subsets were considered in the subsequent analyses: unfiltered subset (n = 26)-all participants, except one for whom no Somfit data were captured/scored; good-capture subset (n = 15)-participants for whom > 80% of Somfit data were captured/scored; excellent-capture subset (n = 7)-participants for whom > 99.9% of Somfit data were captured/scored. Agreement for the five-state categorisation of time in bed was calculated as the percentage of PSG epochs correctly scored by Somfit as N1, N2, N3, REM, or wake. Agreement (and Cohen's kappa) was 63% (0.47) for the unfiltered subset, 66% (0.52) for the good-capture subset, and 79% (0.70) for the excellent-capture subset. These data indicate a moderate-substantial level of agreement between Somfit and PSG for the assessment of sleep in athletes. Wearable devices that can capture valid sleep data may also be used to derive important measures related to the circadian system, such as sleep consistency and social jet lag.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.