ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Dynamic Multi-Axis Calibration of MEMS Accelerometers for Sensitivity and Linearity Assessment.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- On-Ground Calibration of a Nano-G Accelerometer for Micro-Vibration Monitoring in Space on a Dual-Axis Indexing Device.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- On the Effect of Intra- and Inter-Node Sampling Variability on Operational Modal Parameters in a Digital MEMS-Based Accelerometer Sensor Network for SHM: A Preliminary Numerical Investigation.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A set of commercial triaxial micro-electromechanical systems (MEMS) accelerometers was calibrated using a custom-designed test bench featuring a rotating table. The calibration setup enabled simultaneous assessment of all accelerometer measurement components, generating precise reference accelerations within a frequency range of 0 to 8 Hz. A working model of the calibration setup and procedure was described to provide a complete uncertainty budget for both the reference and sensor accelerations. Through experimental uncertainty assessment of all the accelerometers, linearity and sensitivity were evaluated at different sensor levels. These parameters were determined by considering a single value for each accelerometer and detailing the analysis for each axis. Data processing revealed the achievable level of uncertainty and how it was influenced by the evaluation method employed for analyzing the calibration data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.