ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Personalised Risk Modelling for Older Adult Cancer Survivors: Combining Wearable Data and Self-Reported Measures to Address Time-Varying Risks.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Leveraging Real-World Data for Clinical Decision Making in Geriatric Oncology.Drugs & aging · 2026Review
- Wearable Technology and Sensors for Healthcare and Wellbeing.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Multimodal Sensing and Modeling of Endocrine Therapy Adherence in Breast Cancer Survivors.Proceedings of the ACM on interactive, mobile, wearable and ubiquitous technologies · 2025Article
- Navigating artificial intelligence in home healthcare: challenges and opportunities in nursing wound care.BMC nursing · 2025Article
- Mapping the global landscape of wearable devices in healthcare: A dual-database bibliometric analysis (2016-2026).Digital healthReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Recent advancements in wearable devices have significantly enhanced remote patient monitoring, enabling healthcare professionals to evaluate conditions within home settings. While electronic health records (EHRs) offer extensive clinical data, they often lack crucial contextual information about patients' daily lives and symptoms. By integrating continuous self-reported outcomes related to vulnerability, anxiety, and depression from older adult cancer survivors with objective data from wearables, we can develop personalised risk models that address time-varying risk factors in cancer care. Our study combines real-world data from wearable devices with self-reported information, employing process mining techniques to analyse dynamic risk models for vulnerability and anxiety. Unlike traditional static assessments, this approach recognises that risk factors evolve. Collaborating with healthcare professionals, we analysed data from the LifeChamps study to create two dynamic risk models. This collaborative effort revealed how activity and sleep patterns influence self-reported vulnerability and anxiety among participants. It underscored the potential of wearable sensors and artificial intelligence techniques for deeper analysis and understanding, making us all part of a larger effort in cancer care. Overall, patients with prolonged sedentary activity had a higher risk of vulnerability, while those with highly dynamic sleep patterns were more likely to report anxiety and depression. Prostate-metastatic patients showed an increased risk of vulnerability compared to other cancer types.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.