ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Extracting Sensory Preferability from Motor Streams.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
(1) Background: Based on the reafference principle, our system creates an efferent signal copy to distinguish external inputs from our activities in the afferent signal. According to this principle, sensory and motor information from the outside world travel together from the periphery to the brain. (2) Methods: This work introduces signal processing methods that extract contextual sensory preferences from motor streams. Speed and acceleration data were collected as participants walked under different conditions: in silence (with open and closed eyes), while listening to two different songs (each with open and closed eyes), and finally while walking to their favorite song. Ten individuals completed a total of seven conditions. (3) Results: Variations in the walking patterns of each participant were identified, revealing the sensory inputs they perceived. The results also indicated the audio and visual conditions that optimized the participant's sensory-motor system performance. (4) Conclusions: The outcomes suggest that we can extract from motor stream particulars that go beyond an individual's movement qualities and toward the contextual sensory inputs accompanying the movement data, even when participants execute the very same task of walking.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.