ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Optimizing Depression Classification Using Combined Datasets and Hyperparameter Tuning with Optuna.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Subject-Wise Depression Screening from Eight-Channel Resting-State EEG Using Asymmetry-Aware Spectral Features and Connectivity Ablation.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Depression Detection from Three-Channel Resting-State EEG Using a Hybrid Conv1D and Spectral-Statistical Fusion Model.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Interpretable Machine Learning Analysis of Design Factors in Hydrogel Supercapacitors.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This research focuses on the depression states classification of EEG signals using the EEGNet model optimized with Optuna. The purpose was to increase model performance by combining data from healthy and depressed subjects, which ensured model robustness across datasets. The methodology comprised the construction of a preprocessing pipeline, which included noise filtering, artifact removal, and signal segmentation. Additive extraction from time and frequency domains further captured important features of EEG signals. The model was developed on a merged dataset (DepressionRest and MDD vs. Control) and evaluated on an independent dataset, 93.27% (±0.0610) accuracy with a 34.16 KB int8 model, ideal for portable EEG diagnostics. These results are promising in terms of model performance and depression state-of-the-art classification accuracy. The results suggest that the hyperparameter-optimized Optuna model performs adequately to cope with the variability of real-world data. Furthermore, the model will need improvement before generalization to other datasets, such as the DepressionRest dataset, can be realized. The research identifies the advantages of EEGNet models and optimization using Optuna for clinical diagnostics, with remarkable performance for deployed real-world models. Future work includes the incorporation of the model into portable clinical systems while ensuring compatibility with current EEG devices, as well as the continuous improvement of model performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.