Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40218557›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Integrating Color and Contour Analysis with Deep Learning for Robust Fire and Smoke Detection.

Abror Shavkatovich Buriboev, Akmal Abduvaitov, Heung Seok Jeon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Abror Shavkatovich BuriboevDepartment of AI-Software, Gachon University, Seongnam-si 13120, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-8024-6200
Akmal AbduvaitovDepartment of IT, Samarkand Branch of Tashkent University of Information Technologies, Samarkand 100084, Uzbekistan.
Heung Seok JeonDepartment of Computer Engineering, Konkuk University, Chungju 27478, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-3672-9568

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea No. RS-2024-00412141
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Detecting fire and smoke is essential for maintaining safety in urban, industrial, and outdoor settings. This study suggests a unique concatenated convolutional neural network (CNN) model that combines deep learning with hybrid preprocessing methods, such as contour-based algorithms and color characteristics analysis, to provide reliable and accurate fire and smoke detection. A benchmark dataset with a variety of situations, including dynamic surroundings and changing illumination, the D-Fire dataset was used to assess the technique. Experiments show that the suggested model outperforms both conventional techniques and the most advanced YOLO-based methods, achieving accuracy (0.989) and recall (0.983). In order to reduce false positives and false negatives, the hybrid architecture uses preprocessing to enhance Regions of Interest (ROIs). Additionally, pooling and fully linked layers provide computational efficiency and generalization. In contrast to current approaches, which frequently concentrate only on fire detection, the model's dual smoke and fire detection capabilities increase its adaptability. Although preprocessing adds a little computing expense, the methodology's excellent accuracy and resilience make it a dependable option for safety-critical real-world applications. This study sets a new standard for smoke and fire detection and provides a route forward for future developments in this crucial area.

Indexed as

color and contour analysisconcatenated CNNfire and smoke detection

Identifiers

PMID40218557
PMCPMC11991653

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.