ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Advances in Deep Learning for Semantic Segmentation of Low-Contrast Images: A Systematic Review of Methods, Challenges, and Future Directions.
Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Fusion-Based Semantic Segmentation and 3D Reconstruction Using Radar-LiDAR Point Clouds: A Comparative Evaluation of DeepLabv3 and FCN-ResNet Against Traditional Architectures.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Study on mmage defect recognition and classification of power transmission equipment based on lightweight model residual Mamba.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Hybrid attention optimized hierarchical multiscale transformer architecture for image super-resolution.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Adaptive RGB-D Semantic Segmentation with Skip-Connection Fusion for Indoor Staircase and Elevator Localization.Journal of imaging · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The semantic segmentation (SS) of low-contrast images (LCIs) remains a significant challenge in computer vision, particularly for sensor-driven applications like medical imaging, autonomous navigation, and industrial defect detection, where accurate object delineation is critical. This systematic review develops a comprehensive evaluation of state-of-the-art deep learning (DL) techniques to improve segmentation accuracy in LCI scenarios by addressing key challenges such as diffuse boundaries and regions with similar pixel intensities. It tackles primary challenges, such as diffuse boundaries and regions with similar pixel intensities, which limit conventional methods. Key advancements include attention mechanisms, multi-scale feature extraction, and hybrid architectures combining Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) with Vision Transformers (ViTs), which expand the Effective Receptive Field (ERF), improve feature representation, and optimize information flow. We compare the performance of 25 models, evaluating accuracy (e.g., mean Intersection over Union (mIoU), Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC)), computational efficiency, and robustness across benchmark datasets relevant to automation and robotics. This review identifies limitations, including the scarcity of diverse, annotated LCI datasets and the high computational demands of transformer-based models. Future opportunities emphasize lightweight architectures, advanced data augmentation, integration with multimodal sensor data (e.g., LiDAR, thermal imaging), and ethically transparent AI to build trust in automation systems. This work contributes a practical guide for enhancing LCI segmentation, improving mean accuracy metrics like mIoU by up to 15% in sensor-based applications, as evidenced by benchmark comparisons. It serves as a concise, comprehensive guide for researchers and practitioners advancing DL-based LCI segmentation in real-world sensor applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.