ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Assessing Effectiveness of Passive Exoskeletons and Tool Selection on Ergonomic Safety in Manhole Cover Removal.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Manual material handling, a common practice in various industries, often involves moving or lifting heavy objects, placing significant physical strain on workers, especially in the lower back. A prime example is manhole cover removal, which typically requires handling heavy weights, potentially leading to lower back muscle strain. This study investigates the effectiveness of a passive exoskeleton in reducing ergonomic risks during manhole cover removal. Twenty able-bodied workers participated, performing the task with and without extractor tools in the field. Techniques such as surface electromyography and inertial measurement units were employed to measure muscle activity and body posture using the Rapid Entire Body Assessment (REBA). This study compared muscle activities and REBA scores under different conditions: manually lifting covers, using an in-house lever tool, and using a sledgehammer and a pick bar tool named Jake, both with and without an exoskeleton. Results revealed that the in-house Lever tool was the safest and most efficient method, resulting in the lowest muscle activities and REBA scores, regardless of exoskeleton use. Interestingly, the exoskeleton significantly reduced muscle strain when using the Jake tool. These findings indicate that while the Lever tool is optimal for this task, passive exoskeletons can effectively lower ergonomic risks associated with more physically demanding tools.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.