ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Energy Loss Reduction for Distribution Electric Power Systems with Renewable Power Sources, Reactive Power Compensators, and Electric Vehicle Charge Stations.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Techno-economic optimization of a hybrid microgrid with integrated backup storage and vehicle-to-grid functionality.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This paper applies the Chameleon Swarm Algorithm (CSA) and Snow Geese Algorithm (SGA) for optimizing the placement of electric vehicle charge stations (EVCSs), renewable energy sources (RESs), and shunt capacitors (SCs). The actual power ranges of the EVCSs of the Vinfast company in Vietnam are used to check the stabilization of the IEEE 85-node distribution power grid by considering four penetration levels of EVCSs, namely 25%, 50%, 75%, and 100%. All penetration levels of EVCSs violate the operating load voltage limits, and the grid cannot work for all the penetration levels. Different scenarios are performed to find the minimum RES penetration level and the most possible SC penetration level to satisfy the operating voltage limits. The use of only SCs cannot satisfy the voltage limits even for the 25% EVCS penetration level. The placement of RESs provides the capability to maintain voltage within the allowed range for 25% and 50% EVCS penetration but not for 75% and 100%. Using both RESs and SCs, the operating voltage limits are satisfied by using RESs with 1385 kW (about 30.44% of loads and EVCSs) and SCs with 2640 kVAr for the 75% EVCS penetration level and using RESs with 2010 kW (about 38.58% of loads and EVCSs) and SCs with 2640 kVAr (100% of loads) for the 100% EVCS penetration level. The study indicates that the installation of EVCSs should be calculated for stable operation of the distribution power grid, and the combination of both RESs and SCs can satisfy the maximum penetration level of EVCSs in the distribution power grids.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.