Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40218489›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Influence of Sampling Rate on Wearable IMU Orientation Estimation Accuracy for Human Movement Analysis.

Bingfei Fan, Luobin Zhang, Shibo Cai, Mingyu Du, Tao Liu, Qingguo Li, Peter Shull

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Bingfei FanCollege of Mechanical Engineering, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310014, China.ORCID 0000-0002-9531-3549
Luobin ZhangCollege of Mechanical Engineering, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310014, China.ORCID 0009-0000-0509-6855
Shibo CaiCollege of Mechanical Engineering, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310014, China.ORCID 0000-0003-0174-3300
Mingyu DuCollege of Mechanical Engineering, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310014, China.ORCID 0000-0002-2880-3679
Tao LiuState Key Laboratory of Fluid Power and Mechatronic Systems, School of Mechanical Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China.ORCID 0000-0002-2797-0264
Qingguo LiDepartment of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, Queen's University, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8200-6550
Peter ShullState Key Laboratory of Mechanical System and Vibration, School of Mechanical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China.ORCID 0000-0001-8931-5743

Funding

Key Research and Development Program of Zhejiang province 2023C03159National Key Research and Development Program of China 2022YFC3601702National Natural Science Foundation of China 52305038National Natural Science Foundation of China 62373326Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang province LQ23E050019
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wearable inertial measurement units (IMUs) have been widely used in human movement analysis outside the laboratory. However, the IMU-based orientation estimation remains challenging, particularly in scenarios involving relatively fast movements. Increased sampling rate has the potential to improve accuracy, but it also increases power consumption and computational complexity. The relationship between sampling frequencies and accuracies remains unclear. We thus investigated the specific influence of IMU sampling frequency on orientation estimation across a spectrum of movement speeds and recommended sufficient sampling rates. Seventeen healthy subjects wore IMUs on their thigh, shank, and foot and performed walking (1.2 m/s) and running (2.2 m/s) trials on a treadmill, and a motion testbed with an IMU was used to mimic high-frequency cyclic human movements up to 3.0 Hz. Four widely used IMU sensor fusion algorithms computed orientations at 10, 25, 50, 100, 200, 400, 800, and 1600 Hz and were compared with marker-based optical motion capture (OMC) orientations to determine accuracy. Results suggest that the sufficient IMU sampling rate for walking is 100 Hz, running is 200 Hz, and high-speed cyclic movements is 400 Hz. The accelerometer sampling rate is less important than the gyroscope sampling rate. Further, accelerometer sampling rates exceeding 100 Hz even resulted in decreased accuracy because excessive orientation updates using distorted accelerations and angular velocity introduced more error than merely using angular velocity. These findings could serve as a foundation to inform wearable IMU development or selection across a spectrum of human gait movement speeds.

Indexed as

Wearable Electronic DevicesAccelerometryAdultAlgorithmsFemaleHumansMaleMovementRunningWalkingYoung Adulthigh-rate gyroscopeinertial measurement unitorientation estimationsampling rate influencesensor fusion algorithmsstrap-down integration

Identifiers

PMID40218489
PMCPMC11991382

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.