Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40218363›Full record

ReviewAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2025

Mathematical Methods Applied to the Problem of Dairy Cow Replacements: A Scoping Review.

Osvaldo Palma, Lluis M Plà-Aragonés, Alejandro Mac Cawley, Víctor M Albornoz

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Osvaldo PalmaDepartment of Mathematics, Universidad de Lleida, 73 Jaume II, 25001 Lleida, Spain.ORCID 0009-0002-0352-0864
Lluis M Plà-AragonésDepartment of Mathematics, Universidad de Lleida, 73 Jaume II, 25001 Lleida, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6139-0207
Alejandro Mac CawleyDepartment of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago 7820436, Chile.ORCID 0000-0002-4848-4732
Víctor M AlbornozDepartment of Industrial Engineering, Campus Santiago Vitacura, Universidad Técnica Federico Santa María, Santiago 7650568, Chile.ORCID 0000-0002-8500-1250

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study provides a comprehensive scoping review with the aim of determining the mathematical methods applied to dairy cow replacements that will serve as a basis for future research in this field. In the WOS and Scopus databases, a search was carried out for peer-reviewed, English articles, where a process of discarding those that did not address the topic related to our objective was carried out, and where the titles, keywords, and full text were reviewed sequentially. We obtained a total of 40 selected articles. Dynamic programming is the most commonly used optimization technique, present in 58% of the studies, followed by stochastic simulation in 40%, and deterministic simulation in 8%. Machine learning methods or hybrid approaches are applied in only 5% of the cases. The review identifies milk production as the most frequently used response variable, appearing in at least 58% of the studies, and profit as the primary economic indicator, utilized in 78% of the cases. This research underscores the importance of these methods in improving the efficiency, profitability, and sustainability of dairy farming operations. Future research could address the inclusion in models of diseases and animal characteristics that have not yet been considered, as well as expand the scarce use of machine learning tools and the hybridization of such models with statistical ones.

Indexed as

dairymachine learningmilkoptimizationreplacementsimulation

Identifiers

PMID40218363
PMCPMC11988072

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.