ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2025
A Comparative Study of Optimizing Genomic Prediction Accuracy in Commercial Pigs.
Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genetic Strategies for Improving Pig Robustness: Reducing Antibiotic Use Through Enhanced Resilience and Disease Resistance.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Review
- Candidate Genes, Markers, Signatures of Selection, and Quantitative Trait Loci (QTLs) and Their Association with Economic Traits in Livestock: Genomic Insights and Selection.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Genomic prediction (GP), which uses genome-wide markers to estimate breeding values, is a crucial tool for accelerating genetic progress in livestock and plant breeding. The accuracy of GP depends on several factors, including the statistical model, marker density, and cross-validation strategy. This study evaluated these factors to optimize GP accuracy for eight economically important carcass and body traits in a Duroc × (Landrace × Yorkshire) (DLY) pig population. This study used 50 K SNP chip data from 1494 DLY pigs, which were imputed to the whole genome sequence (WGS) level. Seven different models were compared, including GBLUP, ssGBLUP, and five Bayesian models. The ssGBLUP model consistently outperformed other models across all traits, with prediction accuracies ranging from 0.371 to 0.502. Further analyses showed that prediction accuracy improved with increasing cross-validation folds and marker density, particularly in the low-density panel. However, the improvement plateaued in medium-to-high-density scenarios. These findings underscore the importance of carefully selecting the model, marker density, and cross-validation strategy to optimize GP accuracy for carcass and body traits in commercial pigs. The insights from this study can guide breeders and researchers in maximizing genetic progress in pig breeding programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.