Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40218312›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2025

Evaluation of Graded Levels of Fermented Plant Protein (Proteger

Youhan Chen, Charles Gregory Aldrich

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Youhan ChenDepartment of Grain Science and Industry, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA.ORCID 0009-0008-5180-8655
Charles Gregory AldrichDepartment of Grain Science and Industry, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8983-3652

Funding

Prairie AquaTech G-007801
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study evaluated fermented plant protein (FPP) for extrusion performance and its effects on diet utilization in adult cats. Four diets were formulated: a control with 15% soybean meal (SBM) and three diets replacing soybean meal at 5%, 10%, and 15% with FPP (5FPP, 10FPP, and 15FPP). Diets were extruded using a single-screw extruder, with data and samples collected at 15 min intervals. Twelve cats participated in a 4 × 4 Latin square design, with 9 days of diet adaptation followed by 5 days of total fecal collection for nutrient digestibility and colonic fermentation analysis. Processing effects of FPP inclusion were minimal. The kibble sectional expansion index was lowest for SBM (2.50) and highest for 15FPP (2.82;

Indexed as

bioprocesscatsdigestibilityextrusionhind-gut fermentationpalatabilitysoybean proteinstool quality

Identifiers

PMID40218312
PMCPMC11987889

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.