Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40218309›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2025

Multi-Sensor Integration and Machine Learning for High-Resolution Classification of Herbivore Foraging Behavior.

Bashiri Iddy Muzzo, Kelvyn Bladen, Andres Perea, Shelemia Nyamuryekung'e, Juan J Villalba

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Bashiri Iddy MuzzoDepartment of Wildland Resources, Quinney College of Natural Resources, Utah State University, Logan, UT 4322-5230, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5645-4923
Kelvyn BladenDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, Utah State University, 3900 Old Main Hill, Logan, UT 84322, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2028-5504
Andres PereaDepartment of Animal and Range Sciences, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM 88003, USA.
Shelemia Nyamuryekung'eDivision of Food Production and Society, Norwegian Institute of Bioeconomy Research (NIBIO), PB 115, N-1431 Ås, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-9323-0208
Juan J VillalbaDepartment of Wildland Resources, Quinney College of Natural Resources, Utah State University, Logan, UT 4322-5230, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8868-8468

Funding

AFRI Sustainable Agricultural Systems Coordinated Agricultural Project (SAS-CAP) 2021-69012-35952Utah Agricultural Experiment Station (UAES) 9862
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study classified cows' foraging behaviors using machine learning (ML) models evaluated through random test split (RTS) and cross-validation (CV) data partition methods. Models included Perceptron, Logistic Regression, Support Vector Machine, K-Nearest Neighbors, Random Forest (RF), and XGBoost (XGB). These models classified activity states (active vs. static), foraging behaviors (grazing (GR), resting (RE), walking (W), ruminating (RU)), posture states (standing up (SU) vs. lying down (LD)), and posture combinations with rumination and resting behaviors (RU_SU, RU_LD, RE_SU, and RE_LD). XGB achieved the highest accuracy for state classification (74.5% RTS, 74.2% CV) and foraging behavior (69.4% CV). RF outperformed XGB in other classifications, including GR, RE, and RU (62.9% CV vs. 56.4% RTS), posture (83.9% CV vs. 79.4% RTS), and behaviors-by-posture (58.8% CV vs. 56.4% RTS). Key predictors varied: speed and Actindex were crucial for GR and W when increasing and for RE and RU when decreasing. X low values were linked to RE_SU and RU_SU, while X and Z influenced RE_LD more. RTS showed higher accuracy in activity states classification while CV in foraging behaviors and by posture classification. These results emphasize CV in RF's reliability in managing complex behavioral patterns and the importance of continuous recording devices and movement data to monitor cattle behavior accurately.

Indexed as

behaviors classificationcross validationRandom Forestrandom test splitXGBoost

Identifiers

PMID40218309
PMCPMC11988067

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.