ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Computer-Aided Evaluation of Interstitial Lung Diseases.
Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- High-resolution computed tomography assessment of connective tissue disease-associated interstitial lung disease: Advances in diagnosis and prognostic evaluation.World journal of radiology · 2026Review
- Pulmonary Function Decline in Very Early Diagnosis of Systemic Sclerosis: A Retrospective Longitudinal Single-Center Study.ACR open rheumatology · 2026Article
- AI-Based HRCT Quantification in Connective Tissue Disease-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Epidemiological analysis and temporal trends of interstitial lung diseases in global, Chinese, and Belt and Road Initiative countries: 1990-2021.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The approach for the diagnosis and treatment of interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) has changed in recent years, mainly for the identification of new entities, such as interstitial lung abnormalities (ILAs) and progressive pulmonary fibrosis (PPF). Clinicians and radiologists are facing new challenges for the screening, diagnosis, prognosis, and follow-up of ILDs. The detection and classification of ILAs or the identification of fibrosis progression at high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) is difficult, with high inter-reader variability, particularly for non-expert radiologists. In the last few years, various software has been developed for ILD evaluation at HRCT, with excellent results, equal to or more reliable than humans. AI tools can classify ILDs, quantify the extent, analyze the features hidden from the human eye, predict prognosis, and evaluate the progression of the disease. More advanced tools can incorporate clinical and radiological data to obtain personalized prognosis, with the potential ability to steer treatment decisions. To step forward and implement in daily practice such tools, more collaboration is required to collect more homogeneous clinical and radiological data; furthermore, more robust, prospective trials, with the new AI-derived biomarkers compared with each other, are needed to demonstrate the real reliability of the computer-aided evaluation of ILDs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.