Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40218216›Full record

ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2025

A Systematic Integration of Artificial Intelligence Models in Appendicitis Management: A Comprehensive Review.

Ivan Maleš, Marko Kumrić, Andrea Huić Maleš, Ivan Cvitković, Roko Šantić, Zenon Pogorelić, Joško Božić

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ivan MalešDepartment of Abdominal Surgery, University Hospital of Split, Spinčićeva 1, 21000 Split, Croatia.ORCID 0009-0007-1715-0768
Marko KumrićDepartment of Pathophysiology, School of Medicine, University of Split, Šoltanska 2A, 21000 Split, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0002-9696-3359
Andrea Huić MalešDepartment of Pediatrics, University Hospital of Split, Spinčićeva 1, 21000 Split, Croatia.
Ivan CvitkovićDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, University Hospital of Split, Spinčićeva 1, 21000 Split, Croatia.
Roko ŠantićDepartment of Pathophysiology, School of Medicine, University of Split, Šoltanska 2A, 21000 Split, Croatia.
Zenon PogorelićDepartment of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Split, Šoltanska 2A, 21000 Split, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0002-1517-720X
Joško BožićDepartment of Pathophysiology, School of Medicine, University of Split, Šoltanska 2A, 21000 Split, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0003-1634-0635

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) are transforming the management of acute appendicitis by enhancing diagnostic accuracy, optimizing treatment strategies, and improving patient outcomes. This study reviews AI applications across all stages of appendicitis care, from triage to postoperative management, using sources from PubMed/MEDLINE, IEEE Xplore, arXiv, Web of Science, and Scopus, covering publications up to 14 February 2025. AI models have demonstrated potential in triage, enabling rapid differentiation of appendicitis from other causes of abdominal pain. In diagnostics, ML algorithms incorporating clinical, laboratory, imaging, and demographic data have improved accuracy and reduced uncertainty. These tools also predict disease severity, aiding decisions between conservative management and surgery. Radiomics further enhances diagnostic precision by analyzing imaging data. Intraoperatively, AI applications are emerging to support real-time decision-making, assess procedural steps, and improve surgical training. Postoperatively, ML models predict complications such as abscess formation and sepsis, facilitating early interventions and personalized recovery plans. This is the first comprehensive review to examine AI's role across the entire appendicitis treatment process, including triage, diagnosis, severity prediction, intraoperative assistance, and postoperative prognosis. Despite its potential, challenges remain regarding data quality, model interpretability, ethical considerations, and clinical integration. Future efforts should focus on developing end-to-end AI-assisted workflows that enhance diagnosis, treatment, and patient outcomes while ensuring equitable access and clinician oversight.

Indexed as

appendicitisartificial intelligenceclinical decision supportmachine learning

Identifiers

PMID40218216
PMCPMC11988987

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.