Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40218210›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Neuroendocrine Tumor Metastases to the Breast Mimic Breast Primary Carcinoma: Mammography and Multimodality US Assessment in Challenging Differential Diagnosis.

Francesco Marcello Aricò, Antonio Portaluri, Francesca Catanzariti, Elvira Condorelli, Demetrio Aricò, Mariagiovanna Zagami, Emilia Magliolo, Sara Monforte, Maria Adele Marino

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Francesco Marcello AricòDiagnostic and Interventional Radiology Unit, BIOMORF Department, University Hospital "Policlinico G. Martino", 98124 Messina, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4230-8332
Antonio PortaluriDiagnostic and Interventional Radiology Unit, BIOMORF Department, University Hospital "Policlinico G. Martino", 98124 Messina, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7953-8916
Francesca CatanzaritiDiagnostic and Interventional Radiology Unit, BIOMORF Department, University Hospital "Policlinico G. Martino", 98124 Messina, Italy.
Elvira CondorelliDiagnostic and Interventional Radiology Unit, BIOMORF Department, University Hospital "Policlinico G. Martino", 98124 Messina, Italy.
Demetrio AricòDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Humanitas Oncological Centre of Catania, 95125 Catania, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5798-9943
Mariagiovanna ZagamiPathology Unit, Ospedale "San Vincenzo", 98039 Taormina (ME), Italy.
Emilia MaglioloPathology Unit, Ospedale "San Vincenzo", 98039 Taormina (ME), Italy.
Sara MonforteUOC Radiologia Sezione di Senologia, Ospedale "San Vincenzo", 98039 Taormina (ME), Italy.
Maria Adele MarinoDiagnostic and Interventional Radiology Unit, BIOMORF Department, University Hospital "Policlinico G. Martino", 98124 Messina, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5614-2660

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metastases to the breast from non-mammary malignancies are rare, accounting for 0.1-5% of all breast malignancies. Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) rarely metastasize to the breast. PET-CT somatostatin receptor imaging plays a pivotal role in the staging and follow-up of NETs, leveraging tracers like 68Ga-DOTATOC that bind to somatostatin receptors (SSTRs) expressed on tumor cells. While both primary and metastatic NETs express SSTRs, primary breast tumors may also exhibit an uptake of 68Ga-somatostatin analogs, making the differential diagnosis between primary breast tumors and neuroendocrine metastases challenging. Additionally, imaging characteristics of breast metastases from NETs are poorly documented in the literature, posing a diagnostic challenge that extends to pathology, particularly when in the absence of clinical suspicion. Misdiagnosis in such cases can lead to inappropriate therapeutic interventions. We report the case of a 75-year-old female patient with a history of pancreatic NET who presented to our breast clinic for further evaluation of a breast mass after a PET-CT scan revealed moderate 68Ga-DOTATOC uptake. Multimodality breast examination, including mammography and multiparametric US with B-mode, Color Doppler, Strain Elastography (SE), Shear Wave Elastography (SWE), and contrast-enhanced US (CEUS), was performed. Following a core biopsy, the lesion underwent surgical excision, revealing the diagnosis of NET metastasis. This case highlights a rare instance of neuroendocrine tumor metastasis to the breast, assessed using various ultrasound techniques, with detailed imaging and quantitative analysis. The comprehensive multimodal assessment contributes to the limited body of literature and provides elements for the differential diagnosis of a rare breast lesion that should always be considered in the presence of a known primary NET.

Indexed as

68Ga-DOTATOC PET-CTbreast metastasescontrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS)differential diagnosismisdiagnosismultimodality ultrasoundneuroendocrine tumors (NETs)pancreatic NETshear wave elastography (SWE)somatostatin receptor imaging

Identifiers

PMID40218210
PMCPMC11988801

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.