Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40218133›Full record

ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Assessing Patient Satisfaction with Hospital Services: Perspectives from Bihor County Emergency Hospital, Romania.

Aliz Ildiko Bradács, Florica Voiță-Mekeres, Lucia Georgeta Daina, Lavinia Davidescu, Călin Tudor Hozan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Aliz Ildiko BradácsDoctoral School of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, University of Oradea, 410087 Oradea, Romania.
Florica Voiță-MekeresDoctoral School of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, University of Oradea, 410087 Oradea, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-5960-9043
Lucia Georgeta DainaDoctoral School of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, University of Oradea, 410087 Oradea, Romania.
Lavinia DavidescuDepartment of Medical Disciplines, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, University of Oradea, 410087 Oradea, Romania.
Călin Tudor HozanDepartment of Surgical Disciplines, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, University of Oradea, 410087 Oradea, Romania.

Funding

University of Oradea
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

objectivesThe objective of this study is to assess overall patient satisfaction with hospital services, including cleanliness, ward conditions, and food quality. Another key goal is to determine patient willingness to return for future medical services and identify the factors influencing this decision. Moreover, the study explores the relationship between patient satisfaction and continuity of care, as indicated by previous hospitalizations.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study to evaluate patient satisfaction at the Bihor County Emergency Clinical Hospital in Oradea, Romania. A standardized 40-item questionnaire was developed in accordance with the Framework Agreement on the provision of medical assistance within the Romanian healthcare system. The survey, which was administered over a four-year period (2019-2022), covered seven domains: demographic data, accessibility, hotel conditions, quality of care, patient safety and rights, overall satisfaction, and feedback. A total of 12,802 patients completed the questionnaire, and all statistical analyses were performed using R Studio.

resultsThis study analyzes patient-reported satisfaction and experiences in a large healthcare facility, based on data from 12,802 participants. Overall, 91% of respondents rated the hospital positively, with 62% giving an excellent score. Spiritual assistance was well received (71%), and 70% of patients expressed willingness to return for future medical needs. Hospital cleanliness and ward conditions were rated highly, with 71% of respondents reporting excellent experiences. Food quality was positively reviewed by 66% of participants. Most patients (95%) confirmed proper hygiene practices by medical staff, and 95% were informed about their diagnosis. However, only 67% were aware of the complaint submission process. The dataset spans 2019-2022, with the highest hospitalizations in 2020 (36%) and obstetrics, cardiology, and general surgery being the most common specialties.

conclusionsThis dataset reflects a high level of patient satisfaction across multiple dimensions of hospital services, including cleanliness, quality of care, and patient information. However, areas such as complaint handling and transparency in medication handling require further attention to improve the overall patient experience. The findings underscore the hospital's strong performance in meeting patient expectations while identifying key areas for continued improvement.

Indexed as

continuity of carehealthcare qualityhospital servicespatient experiencepatient satisfaction

Identifiers

PMID40218133
PMCPMC11988329

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.