Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40218117›Full record

ReviewHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Patient-Practitioner-Environment Synchronization: Four-Step Process for Integrating Interprofessional and Distinctive Competencies in Osteopathic Practice-A Scoping Review with Integrative Hypothesis.

Christian Lunghi, Francesca Baroni, Giandomenico D'Alessandro, Giacomo Consorti, Marco Tramontano, Laurent Stubbe, Josie Conte, Torsten Liem, Rafael Zegarra-Parodi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Christian LunghiBMS Formation, 75116 Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-0673-6241
Francesca BaroniBMS Formation, 75116 Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0001-5083-989X
Giandomenico D'AlessandroClinical-Based Human Research Department, Foundation Centre for Osteopathic Medicine (COME) Collaboration, 65121 Pescara, Italy.
Giacomo ConsortiOsteopathy Track and Field Division, Istituto Superiore di Osteopatia, 20126 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3085-283X
Marco TramontanoDepartment of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences (DIBINEM), University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6034-0638
Laurent StubbeESO-Paris Recherche, Ecole Supérieure d'Ostéopathie-Paris, 77420 Champs Sur Marne, France.ORCID 0000-0001-9136-5002
Josie ConteDivision of Family Medicine, University of New England College of Osteopathic Medicine, Biddeford, ME 04005, USA.
Torsten LiemOsteopathic Research Institute, Osteopathie Schule Deutschland, 22083 Hamburg, Germany.
Rafael Zegarra-ParodiBMS Formation, 75116 Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-2418-8592

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA major goal for a significant portion of the osteopathic community is to update osteopathic principles, satisfying three needs: sourcing from the origin, proposing original and unique practical approaches, and describing the entire process in a scientifically updated way. On this line, several interprofessional proposals for healthcare providers have already been made by implementing patient-centered care and touch-based strategies informed by the enactive model. Enactivism principles can provide a foundation for rethinking osteopathic care by integrating environmental, psychological, social, and existential factors to facilitate the patient's biobehavioral synchronization with the environment and social context, address health needs, and enhance the quality of multiprofessional healthcare services. However, there is a need to develop a conceptual model that offers a framework for organizing and interpreting disciplinary knowledge, guiding clinical observation and practical strategies, and defining both interprofessional collaboration and the unique focus of the profession. This scoping review and integrative hypothesis aim to fulfill the need for a more detailed and comprehensive understanding of the distinctive osteopathic care to biobehavioral synchrony, emphasizing both interprofessional collaboration and the profession's unique competencies.

methodsThe present article was developed in accordance with established guidelines for writing biomedical scoping reviews.

resultsA total of 36 papers were considered for thematic and qualitative analyses, which supported the integrative hypothesis. Considering the current tenets for osteopathic rational practice, we propose an integrative hypothesis to focus on a practical framework for osteopathic patient biobehavioral synchronization. Patient-practitioner-environment synchronization could be promoted through a four-step process: (1) a narrative-based sense-making and decision-making process; (2) a touch-based shared sense-making and decision-making process; (3) hands-on, mindfulness-based osteopathic manipulative treatment; (4) patient active participatory osteopathic approaches to enhance person-centered care and rational practice. CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS: The proposed model fosters patient-practitioner synchronization by integrating updated traditional osteopathic narratives and body representations into practice, offering a culturally sensitive approach to promoting health, addressing contemporary health needs, and improving inclusive health services. Future studies are required to assess the transferability and applicability of this framework in modern settings worldwide.

Indexed as

allostasisautonomic nervous systemenactivismevidence-based practiceinteroceptioninterprofessional relationsmanual therapymedical rationalitiesosteopathic manipulative treatmentosteopathic medicineperson-centered careprofessional identityshared decision-makingsynchronytherapeutic alliancetouchtraditional medicine

Identifiers

PMID40218117
PMCPMC11989069

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.