ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Comprehensive Care in Critical Services: A Spanish Qualitative Study.
Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesComprehensive care is crucial in emergency healthcare. In intensive care units, a holistic approach may be difficult to implement due to the conditions of the patients and existing work protocols aimed at maintaining vital functions for the survival of patients. The present study aims to explore and describe the knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions of critical care and emergency health professionals regarding the implementation of integrated care practices within intensive care units, with the goal of identifying barriers and facilitators to adopting a holistic approach in emergency healthcare settings.
methodsThis study implemented an exploratory and descriptive qualitative design with a phenomenological approach through semi-structured interviews with health professionals who had worked in intensive care units or emergency services for both public and private health institutions in Spain (n = 25). The study was conducted during the years 2023 and 2024, using a convenience sampling method along with snowball sampling, and a narrative discourse analysis was performed. The MAXQDA 2022 software program was used. This study was granted due permission by the Research Ethics Committee belonging to the Junta de Andalucía, under protocol code 0768-N-20.
resultsThe total sample consisted of 25 healthcare professionals from critical care and emergency services in Spain. The main themes, as key findings, were knowledge and perception, determining factors, resources and infrastructure, the bioethical dimension, perspectives on comprehensive care, and multidimensional impact. Most of the professionals were familiar with comprehensive care, but lack of resources and time prevented them from carrying it out in their units.
conclusionsFor critical care and emergency professionals, comprehensive care is important to their clinical practice, but barriers to its realization still exist. Understanding the importance to these professionals of the application of comprehensive care is fundamental to establishing measures for its implementation in these services. It is also a motivation to continue providing humanized and compassionate care that respects the patient's dignity. It is a priority to provide the necessary infrastructure and human resources so that patients admitted to these units can be cared for with this tool.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.