ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025
The Role of Histology Alongside Clinical and Endoscopic Evaluation in the Management of IBD-A Narrative Review.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Optimising clinical trial design choices in inflammatory bowel disease.BMJ open gastroenterology · 2026Review
- Beyond the Intestinal Mucosa in Long-Standing Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Consequences of Chronic Inflammation and Endoscopic Approaches to Diagnosis and Management.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- Current approaches to disease severity and therapy effectiveness assessment in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.World journal of gastrointestinal pharmacology and therapeutics · 2026Review
- Histologic Assessment in Ulcerative Colitis: A Survey of Pathologists' Practices and Perspectives.Gastroenterology research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), including Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), are chronic inflammatory conditions requiring continuous monitoring. Today, endoscopy is the gold standard for assessing disease activity, with histological evaluation providing additional insights. Studies suggest that persistent histological inflammation, despite endoscopic remission, may be associated with a higher risk of relapse in UC, suggesting its role in treatment decisions. In CD, histological assessment is limited by its patchy nature, transmural inflammation and lack of validated scoring systems. Few retrospective studies with conflicting results have examined the prognostic value of histological remission in CD, and its role in predicting long-term outcomes remains unclear. This narrative review aims to summarize and discuss the available evidence regarding the additional value of histological assessment in IBD management. In UC, the ongoing VERDICT study is expected to provide evidence on the impact of incorporating histological remission as a treatment target compared to a strategy based on clinical and endoscopic activity. Recently published interim results indicate that targeting histological remission does not lead to better clinical/biochemical disease activity. Thus, while patients achieving histological healing are associated with better outcomes, the question arises whether achieving histological remission is an intrinsic (biological) characteristic of the patient and indicator of an easier to treat patient group or a result of more effective therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.