Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40217924›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2025

From Awake to Minimalist Spontaneous Ventilation Thoracoscopic Lung Surgery: An Ongoing Journey.

Eugenio Pompeo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Eugenio PompeoUnit of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Rome Tor Vergata, 00133 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5958-1423

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spontaneous ventilation lung surgery (SVLS) without intubation is aimed at avoiding adverse effects of mechanical ventilation lung surgery (MVLS) entailing one-lung mechanical ventilation through a double-lumen tracheal tube. This innovative strategy has evolved following the publication of a small randomized study of thoracoscopic pulmonary wedge resection carried out under spontaneous ventilation without tracheal intubation in fully awake patients. It now entails target-controlled sedation, the use of a laryngeal mask, and thoracic analgesia by intercostal or paravertebral blocks and has shown promise both in unicenter and multicenter studies, resulting in optimal feasibility and safety and highly satisfactory results, particularly in patients undergoing lung cancer resection and metastasectomy, lung biopsy for undetermined interstitial lung disease, lung volume reduction surgery for end-stage emphysema, and bullectomy for primary and secondary spontaneous pneumothorax. However, concerns and unresolved issues still exist regarding the advantages and disadvantages of SVLS as well as the identification of optimal indications. This perspective is aimed at providing a critical overview of the current knowledge about SVLS with emphasis on recent data comparing the results with those of MVLS published in the last 10 years.

Indexed as

awake thoracic surgerynonintubated thoracic surgeryregional anesthesiaspontaneous ventilation thoracic surgeryvideo-assisted thoracic surgery

Identifiers

PMID40217924
PMCPMC11989431

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.