ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2025
From Awake to Minimalist Spontaneous Ventilation Thoracoscopic Lung Surgery: An Ongoing Journey.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical evaluation of non-intubated spontaneous ventilation video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in patients with non-small cell lung cancer and compromised pulmonary function: a propensity score-matched analysis.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Transbronchial Lung Cryobiopsy and Awake Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery in Interstitial Lung Disease: Complementary Roles in a Stepwise Diagnostic Approach.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Tubeless strategy following thoracoscopic pulmonary wedge resection: a safe and beneficial option in selected patients.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Tubeless uniportal VATS in thoracic surgery - Indications, ERAS pathways, and outcomes: A review.Biomolecules & biomedicine · 2026Review
- From Awake to Minimalist Spontaneous Ventilation Thoracoscopic Mediastinum Surgery: How Far Are We?Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- To Breathe or Not to Breathe: Spontaneous Ventilation During Thoracic Surgery in High-Risk COPD Patients-A Feasibility Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Is Less More? A Meta-Analysis of Non-Intubated Versus Intubated VATS for Anatomic Resections in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Spontaneous ventilation lung surgery (SVLS) without intubation is aimed at avoiding adverse effects of mechanical ventilation lung surgery (MVLS) entailing one-lung mechanical ventilation through a double-lumen tracheal tube. This innovative strategy has evolved following the publication of a small randomized study of thoracoscopic pulmonary wedge resection carried out under spontaneous ventilation without tracheal intubation in fully awake patients. It now entails target-controlled sedation, the use of a laryngeal mask, and thoracic analgesia by intercostal or paravertebral blocks and has shown promise both in unicenter and multicenter studies, resulting in optimal feasibility and safety and highly satisfactory results, particularly in patients undergoing lung cancer resection and metastasectomy, lung biopsy for undetermined interstitial lung disease, lung volume reduction surgery for end-stage emphysema, and bullectomy for primary and secondary spontaneous pneumothorax. However, concerns and unresolved issues still exist regarding the advantages and disadvantages of SVLS as well as the identification of optimal indications. This perspective is aimed at providing a critical overview of the current knowledge about SVLS with emphasis on recent data comparing the results with those of MVLS published in the last 10 years.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.