ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025
Mushroom Penetrating Keratoplasty: A Narrative Review.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Air-Assisted Dome Drainage in Acute Corneal Hydrops: A 3D-OCT-Guided Approach.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
While full-thickness penetrating keratoplasty (PK) has seen a decline in favor of partial-thickness techniques like endothelial keratoplasty (EK) and anterior lamellar keratoplasty (ALK), PK remains indicated for corneal disease involving the entire corneal thickness. Mushroom keratoplasty (MK) is a noteworthy modification of PK, designed to combine the refractive benefits of a large-diameter anterior lamellar graft with the graft survival advantage of limited replacement of the corneal endothelium. Leveraging the use of a microkeratome, the MK donor graft can be prepared by microkeratome dissection, thereby achieving a central interface compatible with 20/20 Snellen vision. This review explores the various surgical techniques, visual outcomes, graft survival rates, and complication rates associated with MK for various indications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.