Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40217806›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025

What Are SAVR Indications in the TAVI Era?

William Davalan, Walid Ben Ali, Sebastián Mrad, Pierre-Emmanuel Noly

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

William DavalanMontreal Heart Institute Research Centre, Université de Montréal, 5000 Est Belanger Street, Montreal, QC H1T 1C8, Canada.
Walid Ben AliMontreal Heart Institute Research Centre, Université de Montréal, 5000 Est Belanger Street, Montreal, QC H1T 1C8, Canada.
Sebastián MradDepartment of Interventional Cardiology, Montreal Heart Institute, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC H1T 1C8, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-3393-4873
Pierre-Emmanuel NolyMontreal Heart Institute Research Centre, Université de Montréal, 5000 Est Belanger Street, Montreal, QC H1T 1C8, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) has traditionally been regarded as the gold standard for severe symptomatic aortic stenosis (AS), transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has emerged as a compelling less invasive alternative for patients with severe AS across the entire surgical risk spectrum. Despite TAVI's increasing utilization and promising outcomes, SAVR continues to be an essential treatment modality for certain patient populations, including individuals with complex aortic anatomies unsuitable for TAVI, patients presenting with significant aortic regurgitation, individuals requiring concomitant surgical procedures, and cases involving infective endocarditis. Furthermore, concerns regarding the long-term durability and complication profile of transcatheter valves underscore the importance of individualized patient assessment, especially for younger patients requiring optimal lifetime management strategies. This review examines the evolving role of SAVR amidst the growing adoption of TAVI and highlights key considerations for selecting the most appropriate treatment strategy for patients with aortic valve disease, incorporating insights from recent advancements in transcatheter technologies and the latest clinical trial evidence.

Indexed as

aortic valve diseaselifetime managementsurgical aortic valve replacement—SAVRtranscatheter aortic valve implantation—TAVI

Identifiers

PMID40217806
PMCPMC11989778

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.