ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025
Advances in Skin Ultrasonography for Malignant and Benign Tumors of the Head and Neck: Current Insights and Future Directions.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- From Ultrasound to Histopathology: Agreement Analysis and Depth Correction Model for Basal Cell Carcinoma Using a Portable 20 MHz High-Frequency Ultrasound Device.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- High-frequency ultrasound combined with superb microvascular imaging for differential diagnosis of basal cell carcinoma and seborrheic keratosis: a retrospective analysis with nomogram implementation.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- A Novel Radiology-Adapted Logistic Model for Non-Invasive Risk Stratification of Pigmented Superficial Skin Lesions: A Methodological Pilot Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Ultrasound imaging has become an indispensable diagnostic tool across various medical fields. In recent years, there has been growing interest in the use of ultrasonography for the evaluation of skin lesions. However, scientific reports detailing the precise role of ultrasound in determining the morphology of malignant skin tumors still remain limited. Malignant skin lesions, particularly in the head and neck region-their most common location-pose significant challenges due to the complex anatomy of these areas. The primary treatment for non-melanoma skin cancers, including basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), is surgical excision. Mohs micrographic surgery is considered the gold standard due to its tissue-sparing approach and high cure rates. However, it is a time-consuming and resource-intensive procedure that is not always widely accessible. In contrast, standard surgical excision, while more widely available, often results in incomplete tumor removal, necessitating subsequent surgical radicalization or the use of adjuvant therapies. Routine ultrasound evaluation of both benign and malignant skin lesions could enhance early detection and facilitate timely treatment. However, the current body of evidence for the usage of skin ultrasound in presurgical evaluation is poor and lacks standardization. Given these challenges, in this review, we aim to highlight the potential value of preoperative skin ultrasonography in accurately assessing benign and malignant skin lesion dimensions and morphology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.