ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025
Navigating the Complex Terrain of Obstetrics and Gynecology Malpractice: Stakeholders, Expectations, and Legal Implications.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Determinants of Chinese physicians' engagement in narrative medicine: a comprehensive SEM-ANN analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This narrative review delves into the multifaceted landscape of obstetric and gynecological malpractice, focusing on stakeholders' expectations, legal implications, and clinical considerations. Through a comprehensive analysis of the relevant literature, we evaluated 25 articles, culminating in a comprehensive understanding of the primary drivers behind malpractice litigation in this field. The review highlights the complex nature of these issues and their implications for various stakeholders. The key findings reveal the critical role of meeting medical care standards to avoid harm to patients, along with factors such as diagnostic errors, mismanagement of complications, and deficiencies in patient counseling contributing to malpractice allegations. Additionally, issues related to surgical procedures, informed consent, and documentation are explored. The review underscores the importance of collaboration, education, and accountability in mitigating the impact of malpractice and upholding patient safety in obstetric and gynecological practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.