ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025
Extraction of First Permanent Molars in Children-A Comprehensive Review of History, Aim, Space Closure and Other Consequences.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Timing of extraction of compromised first permanent molars and spontaneous space closure without adjunctive orthodontic treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry · 2026Pooled it
- Radiographic indicators of favorable second permanent molar eruption are infrequently present at the time of first permanent molar extraction: a retrospective study.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Integrated Digital Workflow for Single-Site Autogenous Bone Cylinder Augmentation and Immediate Restoration: A Case Report.Dentistry journal · 2026Article
- The property of a root-extended Ti-6Al-4V endocrown utilizing 3D printing for a four-wall defect in endodontically treated molars: An in vitro study.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Key concepts for clinical management of Molar Incisor Hypomineralization.Brazilian oral research · 2026Review
- Article
- Preeruptive Intracoronal Dentin Resorption: Radiographic Diagnosis and Clinical Approach.Case reports in dentistry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Compromised first permanent molars (FPMs) in children pose major challenges for dentists and patients even in low-caries-risk populations. Whether due to caries or Molar Incisor Hypomineralization (MIH), compromised FPMs at an early age require careful treatment planning and timing of extraction, if necessary, to eventually have good space closure with healthy dentition. This comprehensive review explains the concept of early extraction of the FPMs in children and lists the results of published studies and systematic reviews regarding spontaneous or orthodontical space closure after the extraction of an FPM, including its consequences in the long term. In general, the majority of the studies confirm that spontaneous space closure after the early extraction of the maxillary FPM could be achieved if the extraction is performed before the eruption of the second permanent molar (SPM). On the other hand, space closure in the mandible is possible in case of optimal timing of extraction and supporting co-factors, but in practice, it would most probably require orthodontic treatment. The decision to retain or extract compromised FPMs must always be made on an individual basis, taking into account all relevant factors and the long-term effects on the entire stomatognathic system. Early prophylaxis to prevent caries and early management of MIH-affected FPMs should, however, be the first-line approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.