Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40217582›Full record

ArticleCancer science2025

First-Line Genomic Profiling in Previously Untreated Advanced Solid Tumors: 1-Year Follow-Up of the FIRST-Dx Study.

Junichi Matsubara, Kumi Mukai, Tomohiro Kondo, Masahiro Yoshioka, Hidenori Kage, Katsutoshi Oda, Sadakatsu Ikeda, Hiromichi Ebi, Kei Muro, Shinya Kajiura and 4 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Tumor-Agnostic Landscape withCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026
    Observational
  7. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Junichi MatsubaraDepartment of Clinical Oncology, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0116-5133
Kumi MukaiDepartment of Clinical Oncology, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.
Tomohiro KondoDepartment of Clinical Oncology, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5102-2654
Masahiro YoshiokaDepartment of Clinical Oncology, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.
Hidenori KageDepartment of Clinical Genomics, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3658-4442
Katsutoshi OdaDepartment of Clinical Genomics, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Sadakatsu IkedaDepartment of Precision Cancer Medicine, Tokyo Medical and Dental University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Hiromichi EbiDivision of Molecular Therapeutics, Aichi Cancer Center Research Institute, Nagoya, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3155-7576
Kei MuroDepartment of Clinical Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center, Nagoya, Japan.
Shinya KajiuraDepartment of Clinical Oncology, Toyama University Hospital, Toyama, Japan.
Ryuji HayashiDepartment of Clinical Oncology, Toyama University Hospital, Toyama, Japan.
Reiko AshidaSecond Department of Internal Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan.
Masayuki KitanoSecond Department of Internal Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan.
Manabu MutoDepartment of Clinical Oncology, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3127-8203

Funding

Chugai Pharmaceutical
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The FIRST-Dx study prospectively evaluated the clinical utility of the comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) test (FoundationOne CDx) in the first-line setting for patients with chemotherapy-naïve advanced solid tumors (gastrointestinal, biliary, pancreatic, lung, breast, gynecologic, melanoma) in six hospitals in Japan. Here, we report the results of the 1-year interim analysis of the follow-up study about the clinical benefits provided by the upfront CGP test. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), and secondary endpoints were the proportion of patients who actually received molecular-based recommended therapy (MBRT) determined by the molecular tumor board, best overall response rate (ORR) in each line of therapy, and progression-free survival (PFS) ratio (PFS on MBRT/PFS on the first-line therapy). Data from 172 patients with a median follow-up of 15.1 months (range: 0.1-21.5 months) were available. The median OS was not reached. Thirty-nine patients (22.7%) received MBRT during this follow-up period. ORR in first-line therapy was 56.3% in the MBRT group (n = 16) vs. 42.3% in the non-MBRT group (n = 137), and in the second-line was 26.3% in the MBRT group (n = 19) vs. 17.1% in the non-MBRT group (n = 82). Regarding the PFS ratio of second-line MBRT (n = 12), the median PFS ratio was 1.1, and four patients (33.3%) had a ratio ≥ 1.3, indicating that MBRT might be effective in changing the clinical outcome. The findings of this study imply that CGP testing before the standard of care for patients with advanced solid tumors could prove to be a clinically beneficial strategy for guiding subsequent precision anticancer treatments. Trial Registration: Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCT) ID: jRCT1050220041.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingNeoplasmsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGenomicsHumansJapanMaleMiddle AgedProgression-Free SurvivalProspective Studiesdelivery of health carefollow‐up studiesmolecular targeted therapyprecision medicineprospective studies

Identifiers

PMID40217582
PMCPMC12210043

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.