ArticleCancer science2025
First-Line Genomic Profiling in Previously Untreated Advanced Solid Tumors: 1-Year Follow-Up of the FIRST-Dx Study.
Article in Cancer science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Molecular Tumor Boards clinical impact on patient care and structural features: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PLoS medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Real-World Testing Landscape and Costs of Companion Diagnostics and Comprehensive Genomic Profiling Across Nine Solid Tumors in Japan: A 10-Year Analysis.Oncology and therapy · 2026Article
- Clinical utility of comprehensive genomic profiling in thoracic malignancies beyond conventional gene testing.International journal of clinical oncology · 2026Article
- Clinical implications of immune checkpoint inhibitor in chemotherapy-resistant advanced endometrial cancer with a pathogenicInternational cancer conference journal · 2026Article
- Clinical significance of comprehensive genomic profiling in unresectable or recurrent gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a multicenter retrospective cohort study.Journal of gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Tumor-Agnostic Landscape withCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Observational
- Clinical utility of comprehensive genomic profiling test for colorectal cancer: a single institution prospective observational study.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2025Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The FIRST-Dx study prospectively evaluated the clinical utility of the comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) test (FoundationOne CDx) in the first-line setting for patients with chemotherapy-naïve advanced solid tumors (gastrointestinal, biliary, pancreatic, lung, breast, gynecologic, melanoma) in six hospitals in Japan. Here, we report the results of the 1-year interim analysis of the follow-up study about the clinical benefits provided by the upfront CGP test. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), and secondary endpoints were the proportion of patients who actually received molecular-based recommended therapy (MBRT) determined by the molecular tumor board, best overall response rate (ORR) in each line of therapy, and progression-free survival (PFS) ratio (PFS on MBRT/PFS on the first-line therapy). Data from 172 patients with a median follow-up of 15.1 months (range: 0.1-21.5 months) were available. The median OS was not reached. Thirty-nine patients (22.7%) received MBRT during this follow-up period. ORR in first-line therapy was 56.3% in the MBRT group (n = 16) vs. 42.3% in the non-MBRT group (n = 137), and in the second-line was 26.3% in the MBRT group (n = 19) vs. 17.1% in the non-MBRT group (n = 82). Regarding the PFS ratio of second-line MBRT (n = 12), the median PFS ratio was 1.1, and four patients (33.3%) had a ratio ≥ 1.3, indicating that MBRT might be effective in changing the clinical outcome. The findings of this study imply that CGP testing before the standard of care for patients with advanced solid tumors could prove to be a clinically beneficial strategy for guiding subsequent precision anticancer treatments. Trial Registration: Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCT) ID: jRCT1050220041.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.