ArticleBMC psychology2025
Prevalence of depression and associated factors among critically ill pregnant women in Palestine.
Article in BMC psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Title of the study: perceived social support and anxiety symptoms among the Palestinian pregnant women: a cross-sectional study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDepression during pregnancy poses significant challenges for both the mother and fetus, especially in cases where pregnancy complications become life-threatening. Recognizing the prevalence and risk factors associated with prenatal depression in critically ill pregnant women is essential, particularly in resource-limited settings like Palestine.
methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted among 304 critically ill pregnant women in eight Palestinian hospitals between January and March 2024. Data were collected through the Clinically Useful Depression Outcome Scale (CUDOS) and analyzed using SPSS Version 25. Descriptive statistics and multiple regression were applied to identify significant factors associated with depression severity.
resultsThe study found high levels of prenatal depression, with a mean CUDOS score of 55.72. Frequent crying (51%) and persistent fatigue (42.4% always, 41.1% sometimes) were common symptoms. Financial instability (p = 0.003), history of miscarriage (p = 0.005), unintended pregnancies (p = 0.001), and residing in rented housing (p = 0.004) were significant predictors, explaining a substantial variance in depression scores (adjusted R² = 0.56, p < 0.001).
conclusionsThese results underscore the importance of routine mental health evaluations for critically ill pregnant women. Early detection and targeted interventions can improve outcomes for both mothers and their babies, offering essential insights for healthcare providers and policymakers. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Incorporating mental health screening and support within maternal care programs in Palestine can help mitigate depression among high-risk pregnant women, improving maternal and fetal health outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.