Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40217525›Full record

ArticleBMC nursing2025

A mixed methods study of wellbeing and resilience of undergraduate nursing students: implications for the post-pandemic era.

Kim Foster, Louise Alexander, Michael Steele, Tyneille Hale, Larissa Hutchison, Ronald Trejo, Johanna Boardman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kim FosterSchool of Nursing, Midwifery and Paramedicine, Australian Catholic University, Level 5, 215 Spring Street, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia. kim.foster@acu.edu.au.
Louise AlexanderSchool of Nursing & Midwifery, Deakin University, Burwood, Australia.
Michael SteeleSchool of Allied Health, Australian Catholic University, Brisbane, Australia.
Tyneille HaleSchool of Nursing, Midwifery and Paramedicine, Australian Catholic University, Level 5, 215 Spring Street, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia.
Larissa HutchisonSchool of Nursing, Midwifery and Paramedicine, Australian Catholic University, Level 5, 215 Spring Street, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia.
Ronald TrejoSchool of Nursing, Midwifery and Paramedicine, Australian Catholic University, Level 5, 215 Spring Street, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia.
Johanna BoardmanSchool of Nursing, Midwifery and Paramedicine, Australian Catholic University, Level 5, 215 Spring Street, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic and rapid shift to online learning have had ongoing impacts on nursing students' wellbeing and resilience. We are yet to fully understand the implications for this emerging workforce in the post-pandemic era. The aims of this mixed methods study were to investigate wellbeing, coping and resilience of undergraduate nursing students in the pandemic; explore relationships between these variables and investigate predictors of wellbeing and coping, including differences between domestic and international students; explore how students experienced and managed adversity; understand how their mental distress and wellbeing were influenced by resilience resources used to deal with adversity, and identify implications for nurse wellbeing as they enter the workforce in the post-pandemic era.

methodsA convergent mixed methods design was used. An online survey investigated wellbeing (COMPAS-W), psychological distress (DASS-21), coping (Brief COPE) and resilience (ARM-R) was completed by n = 175 undergraduate nursing students. Semi-structured interviews with n = 18 students explored how they navigated challenges. Descriptive, correlational, and regression analyses, and thematic analysis, were conducted. Mixed methods analysis was used to integrate both sets of findings.

resultsStudents reported high levels of mental distress, yet also moderate levels of wellbeing and resilience. Key findings included domestic students reporting significantly greater stress than international students, and wellbeing being predicted by lower mental distress and increased problem-focused coping. Students coped with challenges by being proactive, drawing on a range of coping strategies, and seeking technical and emotional support. From a social-ecological resilience perspective, access to and engagement with a range of personal, environmental and relational resources served as protective factors for their wellbeing.

conclusionsThis study provides valuable new insights into protective factors for nurses during a period of extraordinary challenge. In the post-pandemic era, there is a need to strengthen the wellbeing and retention of new graduates now entering the workforce from university. Implementation of targeted strategies to strengthen graduates' peer relationships and sense of belonging at work, and wellbeing and resilience education, are needed. Longitudinal follow-up of graduates' wellbeing is recommended.

Indexed as

CopingMixed methodsPost-pandemic eraResilienceUndergraduate nursing studentsWellbeing

Identifiers

PMID40217525
PMCPMC11987187

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.