ArticleInternational journal of retina and vitreous2025
SmartPlus: a computer-based image analysis method to predict continuous-valued vascular abnormality index in Retinopathy of Prematurity.
Article in International journal of retina and vitreous, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Does field of view matter? Assessing its impact on Plus disease diagnosis in retinopathy of prematurity.International journal of retina and vitreous · 2025Article
- Incidence and treatment outcomes of retinopathy of prematurity in preterm infants assessed through wide-field fundus imaging: a retrospective cohort study.Translational pediatrics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Plus disease is characterized by abnormal changes in retinal vasculature of premature infants. Presence of Plus disease is an important criterion for identifying treatment-requiring cases in Retinopathy of Prematurity (ROP). However, diagnosis of Plus disease has been shown to be subjective and there is wide variability in the classification of Plus disease by ROP experts, which is mainly because experts have different cut-points for distinguishing the levels of vascular abnormality. This suggests that a continuous Plus disease severity score may reflect more accurately the behavior of expert clinicians and may better standardize the classification. The effect of using quantitative methods and computer-based image analysis to improve the objectivity of Plus disease diagnosis have been well established. Nevertheless, the current methods are based on categorical classifications of the disease severity and lack the compatibility with the continuous nature of the abnormal changes in retinal vasculatures. In this study, we developed a computer-based method that performs a quantitative analysis of vascular characteristics associated with Plus disease and utilizes them to build a regression model that outputs a continuous spectrum of Plus severity. We evaluated the proposed method against the consensus diagnosis made by four ROP experts on 76 posterior ROP images. The findings of our study indicate that our approach demonstrated a relatively acceptable level of accuracy in evaluating the severity of Plus disease, which is comparable to the diagnostic abilities of experts.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.