ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2025
Early new bone formation in ovine intramuscular defects: comparison between different silicate-containing calcium phosphate synthetic bone grafts.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe property of in vivo osteoinductivity (OI) has been reported in synthetic calcium phosphates bone grafts, including silicate-containing calcium phosphates in different animal intramuscular defect models. However, most studies that have evaluated osteoinductivity in these models only focus on the formation of new bone at only one endpoint, typically 12 weeks, and without reporting evidence of graft resorption.
methodsThree clinically available silicate-containing calcium phosphate bone graft substitutes were characterised and then implanted into an ovine intramuscular defect model for 6 or 12 weeks to assess their bone forming potential. Bone formation was evaluated with radiographs, micro-CT (µCT) and qualitative histology.
resultThe main physical/chemical differences between the three materials were the morphology and surface areas of the graft materials, but also the form that the silicate was incorporated. One of the bone grafts with a nano-scale microstructure (nano-Si-Ap) resulted in significant new bone formation that was sufficient to bridge between granules after 6 weeks which progressed further after 12 weeks implantation, and evidence of graft resorption/remodelling was observed at both time points. The other nano-scale bone graft (nano-SiO
conclusionsImplantation in ovine intramuscular defects was found to be an effective model to differentiate the relative bone forming potential of three silicate calcium phosphate bone grafts, particularly using a short implantation time of only 6 weeks. Positive outcomes in such a pre-clinical model when evaluating synthetic bone graft substitutes may be clinically relevant to their potential use in challenging bone defects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.