ArticleActa epileptologica2024
A survey of ictal physical examination during VEEG monitoring in a tertiary epilepsy center.
Article in Acta epileptologica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIctal examination based on video-based electroencephalography (EEG) is crucial for locating and lateralizing seizures. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the quality of ictal examination in the Comprehensive Epilepsy Center of West China Hospital, Sichuan University, in order to provide information for quality improvement in daily clinical practice.
methodsVideo recordings of 100 patients with epilepsy were retrospectively reviewed. The performance of the ictal examination was independently reviewed by two epileptologists using an ictal examination protocol.
resultsIn this retrospective analysis, 589 seizure episodes from 100 patients with epilepsy were reviewed. The ages of the patients ranged from 3 to 77 years, with a mean age of 25.8 ± 12.8 years. Among the 589 seizure episodes, a majority (93.7%) were focal seizures. For 226 (38.4%) seizures, the medical staff arrived at the bedside. Among them, 153 (153/226, 64.7%) seizure episodes, the medical staff arrival at the bedside within 30 s of onset, and 120 (120/226, 53.1%) seizures were tested by the medical staff. The compliance rates for "safety" and "visibility" reached 80% or higher while "naming", "retelling", and "memory testing" only reach less than 3%.
conclusionsOur survey identified the main problems in ictal assessments. It is challenging to complete a standardized examination for new trainees at Epilepsy Monitoring Units. Regularly strengthening training in ictal examination and understanding of semiology may improve patients' examination ability. However, further study of the implementation of training is necessary.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.