ArticleCost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E2025
A systematic review of the current application status of decision-analytical models in the pharmacoeconomic evaluation of targeted therapies for pulmonary arterial hypertension.
Article in Cost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe implementation of targeted drug therapy results in a significant improvement in both survival rates and quality of life among patients diagnosed with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), concurrently imposing a greater financial burden on them. The use of pharmacoeconomic evaluation based on decision-analytical models is extensively employed in the rational allocation of healthcare resources.
objectivesThe present study conducted a systematic review of the literature on the pharmacoeconomic evaluation of drugs for treating PAH, with a focus on summarizing the composition and sources of parameters in decision-analytical models. This study aims to provide methodological guidance for future economic research.
methodsThe review was conducted across six databases (PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, CNKI, VIP, WanFang Data) and two health technology assessment agency websites (NHS EED, INAHTA). The characteristics of each study and the compositional details of the decision-analytical models are extracted.
resultsIn total, 13 published studies were included. The pharmacoeconomic evaluation methods employed in the studies included cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) and cost-utility analysis (CUA). The decision analysis models employed in all 13 studies were Markov models. The models were all constructed on the basis of the World Health Organization (WHO) functional class, with variations in parameter settings and sources.
conclusionsAll 13 Markov models provided useful insight into PAH modeling. Future research in this field can employ these research methods according to diverse research objectives. The utility values were derived from a single source; therefore, future studies should evaluate the quality of life in patients with PAH across varying disease severities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.