Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40217292›Full record

ArticleGut pathogens2025

Coupling culturomics and metagenomics sequencing to characterize the gut microbiome of patients with cancer treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Khoudia Diop, Babacar Mbaye, Somayeh Nili, Alysé Filin, Myriam Benlaifaoui, Julie Malo, Anne Sophie Renaud, Wiam Belkaid, Sebastian Hunter, Meriem Messaoudene and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gut pathogens, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Biology · 2025
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Khoudia Diop *Centre de Recherche du CHUM, Montreal, Canada.
Babacar Mbaye *Centre de Recherche du CHUM, Montreal, Canada.
Somayeh NiliCentre de Recherche du CHUM, Montreal, Canada.
Alysé FilinCentre de Recherche du CHUM, Montreal, Canada.
Myriam BenlaifaouiCentre de Recherche du CHUM, Montreal, Canada.
Julie MaloCentre de Recherche du CHUM, Montreal, Canada.
Anne Sophie RenaudCentre de Recherche du CHUM, Montreal, Canada.
Wiam BelkaidCentre de Recherche du CHUM, Montreal, Canada.
Sebastian HunterCentre de Recherche du CHUM, Montreal, Canada.
Meriem MessaoudeneCentre de Recherche du CHUM, Montreal, Canada.
Karla A LeeDepartement of Medical Oncology, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Arielle ElkriefCentre de Recherche du CHUM, Montreal, Canada. arielle.elkrief@umontreal.ca.
Bertrand RoutyCentre de Recherche du CHUM, Montreal, Canada. bertrand.routy@umontreal.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe gut microbiome represents a novel biomarker for melanoma and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). Gut microbiome metagenomics profiling studies of patients treated with immunotherapy identified bacteria associated with ICI efficacy, while others have been linked to resistance. However, limitations of metagenomics sequencing, such as complex bioinformatic processing requirements, necessity of a threshold for positive detection, and the inability to detect live organisms, have hindered our ability to fully characterize the gut microbiome. Therefore, combining metagenomics with high-throughput culture-based techniques (culturomics) represents an ideal strategy to fully characterize microbiome composition to more robustly position the microbiome as a biomarker of response to ICI.

methodsWe performed culturomics using fecal samples from 22 patients from two academic centres in Canada and the United Kingdom with NSCLC and cutaneous melanoma treated with ICI (cancer group), comparing their microbiome composition to that of 7 healthy volunteers (HV), along with matching shotgun metagenomics sequencing.

resultsFor culturomics results, 221 distinct species were isolated. Among these 221 distinct species, 182 were identified in the cancer group and 110 in the HV group. In the HV group, the mean species richness was higher compared to the cancer group (34 vs. 18, respectively, p = 0.002). Beta diversity revealed separate clusters between groups (p = 0.004). Bifidobacterium spp. and Bacteroides spp. were enriched in HV, while cancer patients showed an overrepresentation of Enterocloster species, as well as Veillonella parvula. Next, comparing cancer patients' clinical outcomes to ICI, we observed that among the 20 most abundant bacteria present in non-responder patients, 2 belonged to the genus Enterocloster, along with an enrichment of Hungatella hathewayi and Cutibacterium acnes. In contrast, responders to ICI exhibited a predominance of Bacteroides spp. In NSCLC patients, metagenomics analysis revealed that of the 154 bacteria species isolated through culturomics, 61/154 (39%) were also identified by metagenomics sequencing. Importantly, 94 individual species were uniquely detected by culturomics.

conclusionThese findings highlight that culturomics and metagenomics can serve as complementary tools to characterize the microbiome in patients with cancer. This integrated approach uncovers specific microbiome signatures that differentiate HV from cancer patients, and identifies specific species associated with therapy response and resistance.

Indexed as

CulturomicsGut microbiomeImmunotherapyLung cancerMelanomaMetagenomics sequencing

Identifiers

PMID40217292
PMCPMC11992761

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.