ArticleGut pathogens2025
Coupling culturomics and metagenomics sequencing to characterize the gut microbiome of patients with cancer treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors.
Article in Gut pathogens, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Fecal microbiota transplantation plus immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer and melanoma: the phase 2 FMT-LUMINate trial.Nature medicine · 2026Trial
- BRIDGE-KO: auditable transfer learning with bridged knockoffs improves cross-cohort microbiome prediction of immunotherapy response.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Article
- Intratumoral Microorganisms in Tumors: Current Understanding and Emerging Therapeutic Strategies.MedComm · 2026Review
- Across the Social Network of the Gut: Bacterial, Fungal, and Viral Determinants of Checkpoint Inhibitor Efficacy and Toxicity.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Impact of maternal, infant, and household factors on early-life gut microbiome development in a rural setting.The ISME journal · 2026Article
- Review
- Review
- The gut microbiome as a target in cancer immunotherapy: opportunities and challenges for drug development.Nature reviews. Drug discovery · 2025Review
- The dark matter in cancer immunology: beyond the visible- unveiling multiomics pathways to breakthrough therapies.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Review
- Profiling the human luminal small intestinal microbiome using a novel ingestible medical device.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- Exploring the human small intestinal luminal microbiome via a newly developed ingestible sampling device.ISME communications · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe gut microbiome represents a novel biomarker for melanoma and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). Gut microbiome metagenomics profiling studies of patients treated with immunotherapy identified bacteria associated with ICI efficacy, while others have been linked to resistance. However, limitations of metagenomics sequencing, such as complex bioinformatic processing requirements, necessity of a threshold for positive detection, and the inability to detect live organisms, have hindered our ability to fully characterize the gut microbiome. Therefore, combining metagenomics with high-throughput culture-based techniques (culturomics) represents an ideal strategy to fully characterize microbiome composition to more robustly position the microbiome as a biomarker of response to ICI.
methodsWe performed culturomics using fecal samples from 22 patients from two academic centres in Canada and the United Kingdom with NSCLC and cutaneous melanoma treated with ICI (cancer group), comparing their microbiome composition to that of 7 healthy volunteers (HV), along with matching shotgun metagenomics sequencing.
resultsFor culturomics results, 221 distinct species were isolated. Among these 221 distinct species, 182 were identified in the cancer group and 110 in the HV group. In the HV group, the mean species richness was higher compared to the cancer group (34 vs. 18, respectively, p = 0.002). Beta diversity revealed separate clusters between groups (p = 0.004). Bifidobacterium spp. and Bacteroides spp. were enriched in HV, while cancer patients showed an overrepresentation of Enterocloster species, as well as Veillonella parvula. Next, comparing cancer patients' clinical outcomes to ICI, we observed that among the 20 most abundant bacteria present in non-responder patients, 2 belonged to the genus Enterocloster, along with an enrichment of Hungatella hathewayi and Cutibacterium acnes. In contrast, responders to ICI exhibited a predominance of Bacteroides spp. In NSCLC patients, metagenomics analysis revealed that of the 154 bacteria species isolated through culturomics, 61/154 (39%) were also identified by metagenomics sequencing. Importantly, 94 individual species were uniquely detected by culturomics.
conclusionThese findings highlight that culturomics and metagenomics can serve as complementary tools to characterize the microbiome in patients with cancer. This integrated approach uncovers specific microbiome signatures that differentiate HV from cancer patients, and identifies specific species associated with therapy response and resistance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.