ArticleBMC oral health2025
Effect of different remineralization agents on the optical properties of bleached enamel.
Article in BMC oral health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison of the effect of self-assembling peptide PBMC oral health · 2026Article
- Evaluation of the effects of different remineralizing agents on the microhardness and mineral content of bleached enamel along different storage times.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Synthesis, characterization and evaluation of novel bleaching gels containing bioactive glass and nano-hydroxyapatite on hydrogen peroxide diffusion, bleaching efficacy and enamel protection.Clinical oral investigations · 2025Article
- The Effect of Home Bleaching Gel with Chitosan on Tooth Color and Mineral Alteration.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- The impact of fluorinated graphene versus nanohydroxyapatite crystals on artificial white spot lesion microhardness and color change.BMC oral health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of different remineralization agents applied immediately after bleaching on the colour stability, whiteness index and whiteness index difference of enamel.
methodsOne hundred enamel samples from bovine incisors were divided into two groups for at-home and in-office bleaching. The samples were further divided into five subgroups: (1) Acidulated phosphate fluoride (APF), (2) Casein phosphopeptide amorphous calcium phosphate fluoride (CPP-ACPF), (3) Calcium glycerophosphate, fluoride (CaGP, F), (4) Hydroxyapatite, fluoride (HAp, F), and (5) control. After treatment, all samples were stained with red wine. Color measurements were taken at baseline, after bleaching, after remineralization, and after staining using a dental spectrophotometer. Optical parameters included L*, a*, b*, CIEDE2000 color difference (ΔE
resultsColor and whiteness differences after bleaching were statistically similar between in-office and at-home bleaching (p > 0.05). Remineralization protocols had no significant effect on enamel color or whiteness across all groups (p > 0.05), but significant differences were found between the CPP-ACPF, CaGP, F, HAp, F, and control groups (p < 0.05).
conclusionApplication of remineralization agents after bleaching was found to be ineffective on color and whiteness change of bleached enamel. Remineralization agents containing HAp, CPP-ACP and CaGP, respectively, were found to be more successful in terms of color stability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.