ArticleBMC research notes2025
Assessment of knowledge, attitudes, and practices of antibiotic resistance among university students in Saudi Arabia.
Article in BMC research notes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Assessment of Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices on Antibiotic Use and Resistance Among Healthcare Workers in Monrovia, Liberia: A Facility-Based Cross-Sectional Study.Drug, healthcare and patient safety · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveAntibiotic resistance is a global health threat, driven by widespread misconceptions and the misuse of antibiotics. This study aims to assess the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of undergraduate students at the University of Tabuk, Saudi Arabia, regarding antibiotic use and resistance, identifying key misconceptions and behaviours contributing to antibiotic resistance.
resultsThe analysis revealed misconceptions about antibiotic use and resistance among 800 undergraduate students at the University of Tabuk. Approximately 46% of respondents incorrectly believed that antibiotics could treat viral infections, while 23% were uncertain about their effectiveness against bacterial infections. Although 56% acknowledged that antibiotics might lose effectiveness over time, 24% were unsure about the reason. Additionally, 53% mistakenly believed that viruses could develop antibiotic resistance. These findings highlight persistent gaps in understanding among students. Strengthening awareness through workshops and structured interventions could improve knowledge and promote responsible antibiotic use. Addressing these misconceptions is essential to reducing inappropriate antibiotic practices and mitigating the risks associated with antibiotic resistance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.