Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40217242›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of surgical oncology2025

Factors associated with postoperative recurrence in perforated colorectal cancer: unraveling the high recurrence rate of perforated colorectal cancer.

Makoto Takagi, Seongcheol Kim, Masaomi Suzuki, Tetsuyoshi Takayama, Hiroshi Asano

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of surgical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Prognosis of intensive care unit patients with colorectal cancer.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Makoto TakagiDepartment of General Surgery, Saitama Medical University, 38 Morohongou, Moroyama, Irumagun, Saitama, 350 - 0495, Japan. takagi.makoto@1972.saitama-med.ac.jp.
Seongcheol KimDepartment of General Surgery, Saitama Medical University, 38 Morohongou, Moroyama, Irumagun, Saitama, 350 - 0495, Japan.
Masaomi SuzukiDepartment of General Surgery, Saitama Medical University, 38 Morohongou, Moroyama, Irumagun, Saitama, 350 - 0495, Japan.
Tetsuyoshi TakayamaDepartment of General Surgery, Saitama Medical University, 38 Morohongou, Moroyama, Irumagun, Saitama, 350 - 0495, Japan.
Hiroshi AsanoDepartment of General Surgery, Saitama Medical University, 38 Morohongou, Moroyama, Irumagun, Saitama, 350 - 0495, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPerforated colorectal cancer exhibits a higher recurrence rate than non-perforated colorectal cancer; however, the reasons for this difference remain unclear. This study identifies factors affecting recurrence in patients with perforated colorectal cancer who underwent R0 surgery.

methodsThis study included consecutive patients with Stage II or III perforated colorectal cancer who underwent radical surgery at a single center between 2007 and 2020. The comparison group included patients with non-perforated, non-obstructive, non-perforated colorectal cancer who underwent surgery during the same period. Clinicopathological background factors (age, sex, localization, surgical procedure, stoma, T stage, lymphatic invasion, venous invasion, differentiation, extent of lymph node dissection, number of dissected lymph nodes, lymph node metastasis, postoperative complications, and 30-day postoperative death) of perforated and non-perforated colorectal cancers were investigated. Factors influencing recurrence were examined in patients who were followed for more than 3 years after surgery, up to 5 years postoperatively.

resultsThis study included 89 perforated and 323 non-perforated cases. The median patient ages were 74 and 73 years in the perforated and non-perforated groups, respectively. In perforated cases, the proportion of T4 stage tumors was significantly higher (39% vs. 18% in non-perforated cases, with p < 0.001). Additionally, the number of lymph node dissections was significantly lower (10 vs. 17 in non-perforated cases, p < 0.001), and the rate of postoperative complications was higher (46% vs. 7% in the non-perforated cases, p < 0.001). Postoperatively, 55 perforated and 284 non-perforated cases were available for follow-up. Univariate analysis revealed that perforation, T4 stage, lymph node metastases, and postoperative complications were associated with significantly higher recurrence rates. Multivariate analysis identified T4 stage and lymph node metastases as independent risk factors.

conclusionsThe recurrence rate of perforated colorectal cancer was higher than that of non-perforated cases, primarily due to advanced disease stages, such as T4 or lymph node metastases. Perforation itself may not directly cause recurrence but reflects cancer progression. Further research is needed to clarify the mechanisms linking cancer progression, perforation, and recurrence.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsIntestinal PerforationNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPostoperative ComplicationsAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLymphatic MetastasisLymph Node ExcisionMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPrognosisRetrospective StudiesColorectal neoplasmsIntestinal perforationNeoplasm staging

Identifiers

PMID40217242
PMCPMC11987410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.