Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40217239›Full record

Trial reportBMC oral health2025

Impact of an oral care intervention protocol on oral health outcomes in head and neck cancer patients undergoing radiation or chemoradiation therapy.

Radhika R Pai, Sourjya Banerjee, Linu Sara George, Anice George, Ravikiran Ongole

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC oral health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Essential oral health competencies for cancer care: standardizing dental education for modern practice.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Radhika R PaiFundamentals of Nursing Department, Manipal College of Nursing, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India.
Sourjya BanerjeeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Kasturba Hospital, Mangalore, India.
Linu Sara GeorgeFundamentals of Nursing Department, Manipal College of Nursing, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India.
Anice GeorgeChild Health Nursing Department, Manipal College of Nursing, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India.
Ravikiran OngoleDepartment of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Manipal College of Dental Sciences, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Mangalore, India. Ravikiran.ongole@manipal.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHead and neck cancer patients receiving chemotherapy and radiation therapy may experience a notable and frequently sudden decline in their oral health. These alterations include oral mucositis that develops during and shortly after treatment, candida infections, trouble speaking, difficulty eating, bleeding gums, and tissue fibrosis. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis study aimed to determine the effectiveness of oral care intervention protocol (OCIP) on oral health and oral complications. The experimental group received a structured oral care protocol, and the control group received oral care as per the standard of care of the study setting. These patients were observed every week for up to 6 weeks until the completion of radiation therapy/chemoradiation. An experimental design using a randomized controlled trial was adopted for the study. After providing informed consent, the data were collected from 80 head and neck cancer patients.

resultsThe maximum number of patients, i.e., 42.5% in the experimental group and 32.5% in the control group, were diagnosed with tongue cancer. Most of the participants, i.e., 57.5% in the experimental group and 67.5% in the control group, received chemoradiation as the treatment plan. Among all the oral complications, the median days to develop mucositis (p =.015), swallowing difficulty (p =.009), and chewing difficulty (p =.032) were significantly different from those of the control, indicating that the intervention was effective. As treatment progressed over the weeks, the severity of the oral problems increased in both groups (p =.001). Compared with routine care, oral care intervention improved oral health scores among cancer patients receiving head and neck radiation therapy/chemoradiation [F (401.982), p =.001].

conclusionThese data suggest that the OCIP is clinically helpful in maintaining overall oral health among cancer patients receiving head and neck radiation/chemoradiation. The OCIP effectively delays the incidence of oral complications arising from head and neck radiation therapy/chemotherapy but does not prevent them. The findings of this study can also contribute to providing evidence for the use of an oral care kit, including all evidence-based interventions for patients receiving head and neck radiation/chemoradiation.

Indexed as

ChemoradiotherapyHead and Neck NeoplasmsOral HealthOral HygieneAdultAgedCandidiasis, OralDeglutition DisordersFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedStomatitisTongue NeoplasmsTreatment OutcomeChemoradiationHead and neck cancer patientsOral care intervention protocolOral health outcomesRadiation therapy

Identifiers

PMID40217239
PMCPMC11987221

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.