Observational studyBMC oral health2025
Reliability of teledentistry mobile photos versus conventional clinical examination for dental caries diagnosis on occlusal surfaces in a group of school children: a diagnostic accuracy study.
Observational study in BMC oral health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06661837 (Reliability Of Teledentistry Mobile Photos Versus Conventional Clinical Examination for Dental Caries Diagnosis in A Group of School Children), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Reliability Of Teledentistry Mobile Photos Versus Conventional Clinical Examination for Dental Caries Diagnosis in A Group of School Children: A Diagnostic Accuracy Study
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Emerging trends in the early diagnosis of dental caries: a scoping review of artificial intelligence, digital diagnostics, and teledentistry.Evidence-based dentistry · 2026Article
- Asynchronous Teledentistry for Caries Detection: A Diagnostic Accuracy Study.International dental journal · 2026Article
- Review
- Evaluating Maternal Accuracy in Smartphone-Based Tele-Dentistry for Early Childhood Caries Detection.Clinical and experimental dental research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTeledentistry offers an effective, cost-efficient solution for caries detection in school children, improving access to early diagnosis and preventive care in underserved areas. Through remote imaging, it enables timely assessments without in-person visits, helping bridge healthcare gaps and enhance children's oral health outcomes. PARTICIPANTS AND
methodsThree examiners participated in this study, examiner 1 (E1) clinically examined the children then examined the clinical photos, examiner 2 (E2) examined the photos only, and examiner 3 (E3) took the clinical photos at school without participating in clinical examination. Sample size consisted of 141 school-going children from primary one to primary six grades. They were examined clinically by E1 using deft/DMFT indices, then clinical photos were taken for both arches from occlusal view. Occlusal surface photos were only included in the analysis. These photos were examined by E1 and E2 after a 48-h wash-out period and the same indices were measured and calibrated.
resultsThere was a strong agreement between clinical and photo diagnosis for E1 (kw = 0.899, p < 0.001), clinical and photo diagnosis for E2 (kw = 0.834, p < 0.001), and image diagnoses (E1) and (E2) (kw = 0.898, p < 0.001). The internal consistency between clinical and photo diagnoses (E2) was acceptable 0.790 (0.706:0.85). For other scores, the internal consistency between all variables was excellent (α > 0.9).
conclusionTeledentistry provides accurate and reliable results. It is a valuable tool for school-screening programs without dental radiographs.
trial registrationIt was retrospectively registered on clinical trial.gov on 25/10/2024 with an identifier NCT06661837.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.