Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40217233›Full record

SynthesisBMC oral health2025

Accuracy of robotic computer-assisted implant surgery in clinical studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Zixin Luo, An Li, Alexey Unkovskiy, Jiang Li, Florian Beuer, Zhe Wu, Ping Li

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC oral health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. [Current applications and future perspectives of automation technologies and devices in oral diagnosis and treatment].Hua xi kou qiang yi xue za zhi = Huaxi kouqiang yixue zazhi = West China journal of stomatology · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. [Application and prospect of digital technology in endodontic microsurgery].Hua xi kou qiang yi xue za zhi = Huaxi kouqiang yixue zazhi = West China journal of stomatology · 2026
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Zixin Luo *School and Hospital of Stomatology, Guangdong Engineering Research Center of Oral Restoration and Reconstruction, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510182, China.
An Li *Department of Periodontology, Stomatological Hospital, School of Stomatology, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510280, China.
Alexey UnkovskiyDepartment of Prosthodontics, Geriatric Dentistry and Craniomandibular Disorders, Charité- Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universitat Berlin, Humboldt- Universität zu Berlin, Aßmannshauser Str. 4-6, 14197, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5487-4251
Jiang LiSchool and Hospital of Stomatology, Guangdong Engineering Research Center of Oral Restoration and Reconstruction, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510182, China.
Florian BeuerDepartment of Prosthodontics, Geriatric Dentistry and Craniomandibular Disorders, Charité- Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universitat Berlin, Humboldt- Universität zu Berlin, Aßmannshauser Str. 4-6, 14197, Berlin, Germany.
Zhe WuSchool and Hospital of Stomatology, Guangdong Engineering Research Center of Oral Restoration and Reconstruction, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510182, China. zhewudentist@gzhmu.edu.cn.
Ping LiSchool and Hospital of Stomatology, Guangdong Engineering Research Center of Oral Restoration and Reconstruction, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510182, China. Pingli@gzhmu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-6713

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 82301134
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo analyze the accuracy of the robotic system in clinical studies and assess potential factors that might affect the accuracy of robotic implant placement. MATERIALS AND

methodsPubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were used to search for studies published from August 2014 till October 2024. Studies on robotic computer-assisted implant surgery (R-CAIS) were identified. Furthermore, manual searches were performed for selected journals. Only clinical studies were included. Subgroup analysis was performed based on robot autonomy, different dentitions, and the working principle of the camera.

resultsSixteen studies met the inclusion criteria, evaluating 908 implants. The meta-analysis of accuracy showed that the average global platform deviation, global apex deviation, and angular deviation were 0.69 mm (95% CI: 0.61‒0.77, I

conclusionThe R-CAIS technology demonstrated a high level of accuracy. However, further large-scale, multi-center, randomized, controlled clinical trials are necessary to compare robotic implant placement with other techniques, and the additional factors influencing robotic implant placement must be explored.

Indexed as

Dental Implantation, EndosseousDental ImplantsRobotic Surgical ProceduresSurgery, Computer-AssistedHumansDental ImplantsAccuracyComputer-assisted implant surgeryDental implantRobot-assisted surgery

Identifiers

PMID40217233
PMCPMC11992838

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.