Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40217227›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2025

Variability in knowledge retention of medical students: repeated and recently learned basic science topics.

Gergely Csaba, István Szabó, József L Környei, Mónika Kerényi, Zsuzsanna Füzesi, Árpád Csathó

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Gergely CsabaDepartment of Behavioural Sciences, Medical School, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary. csaba.gergely@pte.hu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-1030-0626
István SzabóInstitute of Physiology, Medical School, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7450-4728
József L KörnyeiInstitute of Physiology, Medical School, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4533-5368
Mónika KerényiDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, Medical School, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5767-9662
Zsuzsanna FüzesiDepartment of Behavioural Sciences, Medical School, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary.
Árpád CsathóDepartment of Behavioural Sciences, Medical School, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0284-654X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBasic science knowledge is essential for understanding clinical studies and enhancing clinical reasoning in medical practice. However, medical students retain only a portion of the knowledge gained during the early years of medical school. We aimed to examine medical students' knowledge retention of repeated and recently learned topics in physiology and microbiology with additional analysis of individual variability. Given that prior studies have raised concerns about the validity of retention rate as an indicator of stable knowledge, we also explored alternative measures of retention.

methodsNineteen third- and 22 fourth-year medical students volunteered to repeat the written examinations in physiology and microbiology, respectively, in September 2022 at the University of Pécs. Students previously completed a summative test in the fall semester and another test in the spring semester. Both examinations consisted of multiple-choice questions and the second test included questions from both semesters introducing a unique form of spaced repetition. In our study, students repeated the complete second test after a 16-week non-use retention interval. Besides retention rates, we calculated the percentage of consistently correct and incorrect answers as retention measures. Correlations between retention measures and students' grade point averages (GPAs) were examined.

resultsSignificant declines in test scores were observed, with physiology scores dropping from 70.4 to 53.5% and microbiology scores from 72.1 to 57.3%. Retention rates varied significantly, with values ranging from 54.5 to 97.2%. Microbiology revealed better results of first-semester content compared to the second semester in some of the retention measures, while physiology showed no difference between semesters. Retention rates did not correlate with GPA, however, the percentage of consistently correct answers showed moderate positive correlations, while the consistently incorrect answers showed moderate negative correlations with GPA.

conclusionsThere was a substantial knowledge loss among medical students with high individual variability indicating the need to explore factors affecting long-term knowledge retention in real-life educational settings more deeply. Previously acquired knowledge in microbiology demonstrated superior retention, potentially attributable to the beneficial effects of spaced repetition. The lack of correlation between retention rates and GPA suggests that other measures may better reflect stable knowledge.

Indexed as

Education, Medical, UndergraduateMicrobiologyPhysiologyRetention, PsychologyStudents, MedicalEducational MeasurementFemaleHumansMaleYoung AdultBasic sciencesKnowledge retentionMedical studentsMicrobiologyPhysiologySpaced repetition

Identifiers

PMID40217227
PMCPMC11992722

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.