ArticleBMC medical education2025
Variability in knowledge retention of medical students: repeated and recently learned basic science topics.
Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- A quasi-experimental crossover study on student engagement and performance in a gamified team-based learning module in physiology.Medical education online · 2026Article
- Teaching Cell and Gene Therapy in Genetic Counseling Programs: Survey Findings and Suggested Practical Resources for Integration.Journal of genetic counseling · 2026Article
- Oral examination as a tool for mastery learning in undergraduate microbiology.FEMS microbiology letters · 2026Article
- Observational
- Problem-based learning promotes causal physiological reasoning in first-year medical students before formal cardiovascular instruction.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Article
- The effect of using a chatbot integrated with the ARCS motivation model in physiology education: a mixed-methods study.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Article
- Spaced repetition and other key factors influencing medical school entrance exam success: insights from a French survey.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Retention of physiology knowledge among medical students in basic science: a cross-sectional study.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Variability in knowledge retention of medical students: repeated and recently learned basic science topics.BMC medical education · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBasic science knowledge is essential for understanding clinical studies and enhancing clinical reasoning in medical practice. However, medical students retain only a portion of the knowledge gained during the early years of medical school. We aimed to examine medical students' knowledge retention of repeated and recently learned topics in physiology and microbiology with additional analysis of individual variability. Given that prior studies have raised concerns about the validity of retention rate as an indicator of stable knowledge, we also explored alternative measures of retention.
methodsNineteen third- and 22 fourth-year medical students volunteered to repeat the written examinations in physiology and microbiology, respectively, in September 2022 at the University of Pécs. Students previously completed a summative test in the fall semester and another test in the spring semester. Both examinations consisted of multiple-choice questions and the second test included questions from both semesters introducing a unique form of spaced repetition. In our study, students repeated the complete second test after a 16-week non-use retention interval. Besides retention rates, we calculated the percentage of consistently correct and incorrect answers as retention measures. Correlations between retention measures and students' grade point averages (GPAs) were examined.
resultsSignificant declines in test scores were observed, with physiology scores dropping from 70.4 to 53.5% and microbiology scores from 72.1 to 57.3%. Retention rates varied significantly, with values ranging from 54.5 to 97.2%. Microbiology revealed better results of first-semester content compared to the second semester in some of the retention measures, while physiology showed no difference between semesters. Retention rates did not correlate with GPA, however, the percentage of consistently correct answers showed moderate positive correlations, while the consistently incorrect answers showed moderate negative correlations with GPA.
conclusionsThere was a substantial knowledge loss among medical students with high individual variability indicating the need to explore factors affecting long-term knowledge retention in real-life educational settings more deeply. Previously acquired knowledge in microbiology demonstrated superior retention, potentially attributable to the beneficial effects of spaced repetition. The lack of correlation between retention rates and GPA suggests that other measures may better reflect stable knowledge.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.