ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2025
Live birth rate and perinatal outcomes following sequential embryo transfer in women with recurrent implantation failure undergoing frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles.
Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- The Impact of Cleavage and Blastocyst Stage Sequential Transfer on Clinical Pregnancy Outcomes of Frozen Embryo Transfer in Patients with Multiple Transplant Failures: A Retrospective Cohort Study.International journal of women's health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSequential embryo transfer (ET) has been used to improve clinical outcomes in patients with recurrent implantation failure (RIF). This study aimed to evaluate whether sequential ET influence the live birth rate and perinatal outcomes of women with RIF.
methodsA cohort study of RIF patients who underwent sequential ET (Seq-ET) during frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) cycles between January 2020 and June 2023 was performed. FET patients who underwent double cleavage-stage ET (D3-dET) and double blastocyst ET (D5/6-dET) during the same period composed the control group. The live birth rate and perinatal outcomes of the groups were analyzed and compared.
resultsThe Seq-ET group had a significantly greater live birth rate (42.9%) than the D3-dET group (33.1%), and the live birth rate of the Seq-ET group was comparable to that of the D5/6-dET group (35.7%). Female BMI (aOR 0.96, 95%CI 0.92-1.00), stimulation for endometrial preparation (aOR 0.47, 95%CI 0.26-0.84), and endometrial thickness (aOR 1.08, 95%CI 1.00-1.16) were contributing factors to the live birth rate. No statistically significant differences were found in the rate of healthy birth or twins among the Seq-ET, D3-dET and D5/6-dET groups. There was no statistically significant difference in the rates of preterm delivery, birth weight or length, low birthweight, macrosomia, small for gestational age (SGA), gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), gestational hypertensive disease (GHD), or the sex ratio among the three groups. The infants born in D5/6-dET group had less gestational weeks than in the Seq-ET and D3-dET groups (38.05 ± 1.88 vs. 38.43 ± 2.09 and 38.45 ± 1.80, P = 0. 013) and had a higher risk of large for gestational age (LGA) (aOR 2.15, 95%CI 1.00-4.62) compared to infants born in the D3-dET group.
conclusionThe live birth rate was significantly higher in the Seq-ET group compared with the D3-dET group, and slightly higher compared to the D5/6-dET group. Our results suggested sequential ET did not affect the perinatal outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.