ArticleBMC public health2025
Dimensions of violence against healthcare workers in emergency departments: a cross-sectional comparative study.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessment of violence against patients by healthcare providers at the point of service delivery in Sekyere south district.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Burnout among emergency department healthcare workers in Palestine and Türkiye: a cross-sectional comparative study.BMC emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Workplace violence against healthcare workers: a scoping review of reporting practices, barriers to reporting and institutional responses (2020-2025).BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Understanding Workplace Violence in ED: The Maternity Nurses' Experience Using Descriptive Phenomenology.Journal of nursing management · 2026Article
- The rising tide of workplace violence in the healthcare sector: a global scoping review of burden, determinants, and prevention strategies (2021-2025).Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Risk Assessment of Workplace Violence Against Nurses: How Data Collection Methods Influence Results-A Swedish and Italian Cross-Sectional Study.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundViolence against health workers in hospital emergency departments is a global concern. The aim of this comparative study is to assess the differences in the patterns, magnitude, effects and underlying reasons for violence against health workers in the emergency departments of Palestine and Türkiye.
methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted in 14 emergency departments in the West Bank and 3 in Isparta Province in Türkiye. A convenience sample of 377 health workers (227 in Palestine and 150 in Türkiye), consisting of 97 physicians, 198 nurses, and 82 other workers, including administrative and support health personnel, participated in the study. A self-administered survey was used to collect data between June and November 2024. Data was analyzed using SPSS with a significance level set at < 0.05. Statistical methods included, frequencies and percentages of the study variables, as well as Chi-square tests (χ2) and Fisher's exact tests used to assess the differences between the two countries in relation to violence prevalence and related factors.
resultsA total of 68.7% of the participants reported exposure to workplace violence during the past year, which was significantly greater among Palestinian participants (84.6%) than among Türkiye participants. The prevalence rates of physical violence were 28.1%, 35.7% and 16.7% in Palestine and Türkiye, respectively; the prevalence rates of nonphysical violence were 65.3%, 81.1% and 41.1%, respectively (p < 0.05). Among the participants, physicians were the most affected by violence. The perpetrators were mainly (79.0%) patient families/companions and the patients themselves. A long waiting time to receive services, unmet expectations of patients and families and a lack of violence prevention measures were the top reported reasons. Approximately 80.0% of the events were not reported (62.1% in Türkiye, 86.3% in Palestine, p < 0.05), mainly because of a lack of follow-up and actions taken against aggressors or because the events were considered trivial/part of the job or feared consequences of reporting. The impacts of violence include significant negative psychological effects, such as hopelessness, disappointment, fear, and anxiety, in addition to effects on the delivery of care, e.g., minimizing communication and time spent with patients and companions. Violence was also associated with the intention of health care workers to leave their job in emergency services (p < 0.05).
conclusionsContextual differences are evident in the patterns and levels of violence in the countries studied; however, concerns are clearly common regarding and underlying reasons and impacts. The findings show that both settings suffer from considerable levels of workplace violence and negative consequences for healthcare workers and health care services with insufficient measures to combat them, which would require immediate attention. A collaborative approach among key stakeholders for developing and implementing evidence-based policies and strategies to mitigate the risks of this arduous public health problem is crucial.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.