Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40217212›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2025

Dimensions of violence against healthcare workers in emergency departments: a cross-sectional comparative study.

Motasem Hamdan, Ramazan Erdem, Aynur Toraman, Havva Ceylan, Anan Rashed, Bilal Jawabreh

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Motasem HamdanFaculty of Public Health, Al-Quds University, Jerusalem, Palestine. mhamdan@staff.alquds.edu.
Ramazan ErdemDepartment of Health Management, Suleyman Demirel University, Isparta, Türkiye.
Aynur ToramanDepartment of Health Management, Suleyman Demirel University, Isparta, Türkiye.
Havva CeylanDepartment of Health Management, Suleyman Demirel University, Isparta, Türkiye.
Anan RashedPalestinian Ministry of Health, Nablus, Palestine.
Bilal JawabrehFaculty of Public Health, Al-Quds University, Jerusalem, Palestine.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundViolence against health workers in hospital emergency departments is a global concern. The aim of this comparative study is to assess the differences in the patterns, magnitude, effects and underlying reasons for violence against health workers in the emergency departments of Palestine and Türkiye.

methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted in 14 emergency departments in the West Bank and 3 in Isparta Province in Türkiye. A convenience sample of 377 health workers (227 in Palestine and 150 in Türkiye), consisting of 97 physicians, 198 nurses, and 82 other workers, including administrative and support health personnel, participated in the study. A self-administered survey was used to collect data between June and November 2024. Data was analyzed using SPSS with a significance level set at < 0.05. Statistical methods included, frequencies and percentages of the study variables, as well as Chi-square tests (χ2) and Fisher's exact tests used to assess the differences between the two countries in relation to violence prevalence and related factors.

resultsA total of 68.7% of the participants reported exposure to workplace violence during the past year, which was significantly greater among Palestinian participants (84.6%) than among Türkiye participants. The prevalence rates of physical violence were 28.1%, 35.7% and 16.7% in Palestine and Türkiye, respectively; the prevalence rates of nonphysical violence were 65.3%, 81.1% and 41.1%, respectively (p < 0.05). Among the participants, physicians were the most affected by violence. The perpetrators were mainly (79.0%) patient families/companions and the patients themselves. A long waiting time to receive services, unmet expectations of patients and families and a lack of violence prevention measures were the top reported reasons. Approximately 80.0% of the events were not reported (62.1% in Türkiye, 86.3% in Palestine, p < 0.05), mainly because of a lack of follow-up and actions taken against aggressors or because the events were considered trivial/part of the job or feared consequences of reporting. The impacts of violence include significant negative psychological effects, such as hopelessness, disappointment, fear, and anxiety, in addition to effects on the delivery of care, e.g., minimizing communication and time spent with patients and companions. Violence was also associated with the intention of health care workers to leave their job in emergency services (p < 0.05).

conclusionsContextual differences are evident in the patterns and levels of violence in the countries studied; however, concerns are clearly common regarding and underlying reasons and impacts. The findings show that both settings suffer from considerable levels of workplace violence and negative consequences for healthcare workers and health care services with insufficient measures to combat them, which would require immediate attention. A collaborative approach among key stakeholders for developing and implementing evidence-based policies and strategies to mitigate the risks of this arduous public health problem is crucial.

Indexed as

Emergency Service, HospitalHealth PersonnelWorkplace ViolenceAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMiddle EastPrevalenceSurveys and QuestionnairesTurkeyEmergency departmentsHealthcare workersImplicationsPrevalenceWorkplace violence

Identifiers

PMID40217212
PMCPMC11987310

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.