ArticleBMC psychiatry2025
Evaluating the diagnostic validity of CBCL-OCS in Chinese children and adolescents with OCD.
Article in BMC psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesObsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is recognized globally as a serious mental health concern among children and adolescents. Accurate early diagnosis and intervention are crucial for effective management and improving patient outcomes. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic validity of the Child Behavior Checklist-Obsessive Compulsive Scale (CBCL-OCS) in Chinese children and adolescents, ensuring its cultural adaptability. The secondary objective was to explore the clinical characteristics of OCD, including prevalence, symptom severity, and comorbidities.
methodsA cross-sectional epidemiological survey was conducted among 8,595 middle school students in Liaoning Province, China. The CBCL-OCS was employed as the primary screening tool. The optimal cutoff value for OCD screening was determined through receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.
resultsThe study found an OCD prevalence of 1.710%, which was consistent with the global estimation. ROC analysis determined a cutoff score of 2.5 for CBCL-OCS, with a sensitivity of 0.789 and a specificity of 0.899. Furthermore, adolescents exhibited significantly higher CBCL-OCS scores compared to younger children, suggesting an increase in OCD severity with age. Significant associations were also found between OCD symptoms and comorbid emotional disorders, behavioral problems, and anxiety symptoms.
conclusionsThis study confirms the utility of CBCL-OCS as an effective early screening tool for OCD in Chinese middle school students, highlighting its sensitivity and specificity, and cultural adaptability. Results contributed valuable insights to the epidemiology of OCD among children and adolescents, underscoring the need for targeted interventions during critical developmental periods, especially in adolescence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.