Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40217200›Full record

SynthesisBMC public health2025

Exploring the design and impact of integrated health and social care services for children and young people living in underserved populations: a systematic review.

Chris Bird, Lorraine Harper, Syed Muslim, Derick Yates, Ian Litchfield

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Chris BirdBirmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Lorraine HarperDepartment of Applied Health Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Syed MuslimPrimary Health Care Corporation, Doha, Qatar.
Derick YatesBirmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Ian LitchfieldDepartment of Applied Health Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK. i.litchfield@bham.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo explore the evidence for interventions that integrate child health and social care and support programmes and the impact they have on child health and wellbeing. DATA SOURCES: The Cochrane Library, Ovid Medline, Ovid Embase, Ovid Emcare, Ovid Health Management Information Consortium (HMIC) database, and Ovid Social Policy and Practice, Proquest Psychinfo and Ebscohost Cinahl. ELIGIBILITY: Peer-reviewed original research that described an intervention integrating health care and social support or care interventions for children and young people (CYP) up to the age of 18 years in high-income countries. All databases were searched from inception to August 2023. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: 16 studies were identified: 9 quantitative studies including 4 RCTs, 5 qualitative studies and 2 mixed methods studies. Studies were assessed for quality and a narrative review performed. Study heterogeneity meant a meta-analysis could not be completed.

resultsFor the purposes of clarity and understanding we collated the identified studies bv mode of delivery. In doing so we determined three main models of delivering integrated health and social care services: Targeted support for vulnerable groups, where the provision of packages of interventions focussed on target populations, this showed potential for decreasing the need for social support in the long-term but with limited evidence for reducing referrals into other services. These types of service were more successful in meeting specific objectives such as lower rates of smoking, and reducing repeat pregnancies; Collaborative health and social support, which typically collocated health and social care practitioners, demonstrated improved collaborative working but with little impact on workload, job satisfaction, or service delivery; and School centred health and social care, which were based in educational facilities and improved some aspects of CYP wellbeing and physical health but with concerns they added to teacher workload.

conclusionsIntegrated health and social support programmes offer promising solutions to addressing health inequity in children and young people in underserved populations. However, more robust and consistent study designs are needed to guide researchers and policy makers in their implementation and evaluation. PROSPERO REGISTRATION: CRD42023399907.

Indexed as

Child Health ServicesDelivery of Health Care, IntegratedSocial WorkVulnerable PopulationsAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolHumansChildren and young peopleHealth and social careHealth inequalitiesIntegrated care services

Identifiers

PMID40217200
PMCPMC11987436

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.