ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2025
Predicting the efficacy of microwave ablation of benign thyroid nodules from ultrasound images using deep convolutional neural networks.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Early volume reduction slope as a novel predictor of long-term outcomes following microwave ablation of benign thyroid nodules: a machine learning-enhanced prediction model.Journal of ultrasound · 2026Article
- Diagnostic performance of deep learning models on ultrasound images for distinguishing benign from malignant ovarian cysts.Journal of ovarian research · 2026Article
- Prediction of malignancy and metastasis of thyroid cancer by combined feature sets through advanced machine learning.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in the diagnosis of thyroid diseases: applications and challenges.Frontiers in radiology · 2026Review
- Thermal Ablation as a Non-Surgical Alternative for Thyroid Nodules: A Review of Current Evidence.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThyroid nodules are frequent in clinical settings, and their diagnosis in adults is growing, with some persons experiencing symptoms. Ultrasound-guided thermal ablation can shrink nodules and alleviate discomfort. Because the degree and rate of lesion absorption vary greatly between individuals, there is no reliable model for predicting the therapeutic efficacy of thermal ablation.
methodsFive convolutional neural network models including VGG19, Resnet 50, EfficientNetB1, EfficientNetB0, and InceptionV3, pre-trained with ImageNet, were compared for predicting the efficacy of ultrasound-guided microwave ablation (MWA) for benign thyroid nodules using ultrasound data. The patients were randomly assigned to one of two data sets: training (70%) or validation (30%). Accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and area under the curve (AUC) were all used to assess predictive performance.
resultsIn the validation set, fine-tuned EfficientNetB1 performed best, with an AUC of 0.85 and an ACC of 0.79.
conclusionsThe study found that our deep learning model accurately predicts nodules with VRR < 50% after a single MWA session. Indeed, when thermal therapies compete with surgery, anticipating which nodules will be poor responders provides useful information that may assist physicians and patients determine whether thermal ablation or surgery is the preferable option. This was a preliminary study of deep learning, with a gap in actual clinical applications. As a result, more in-depth study should be undertaken to develop deep-learning models that can better help clinics. Prospective studies are expected to generate high-quality evidence and improve clinical performance in subsequent research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.