ArticleBMC infectious diseases2025
The prognostic role of vegetation size in pediatric infective endocarditis: a retrospective study using decision curve and dose-response analysis.
Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo explore the predictive value of vegetation size on the prognosis of pediatric infective endocarditis (IE).
methodsA total of 27 children diagnosed with IE who were admitted to Kunming Children's Hospital from January 2014 to June 2024 were included. The good prognosis group comprised 10 cases, while the bad prognosis group comprised 17 cases. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, restricted cubic spline model, and decision curve analysis were utilized to assess the predictive value of vegetation size on the prognosis of pediatric IE.
resultsThere were statistically significant differences in vegetation size, hemoglobin, platelet count, and prothrombin time between the two groups (P < 0.05). The ROC curve demonstrated that vegetation size had a high predictive accuracy for the prognosis of pediatric IE (AUC = 0.841, 95% CI: 0.775-0.924). Decision curve analysis indicated that vegetation size held substantial clinical value for predicting the prognosis of pediatric IE. The restricted cubic spline analysis revealed a linear dose-response relationship between vegetation size and prognosis of pediatric IE (nonlinear test, P = 0.084).
conclusionSignificant differences were observed in vegetation size, hemoglobin, platelet count, and prothrombin time between different prognosis of pediatric IE. Limited evidence indicates that vegetation size is a critical factor in predicting the prognosis of pediatric IE. However, studies with larger sample sizes are needed to confirm the accuracy of these conclusions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.