Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40217166›Full record

SynthesisBMC infectious diseases2025

Prevalence, antibiogram, and risk factors of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) asymptomatic carriage in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Ahmed Azzam, Heba Khaled, Heba Mohamed Fayed, Youssef Mansour, Mariam Eldalil, Eslam Elshennawy, Haitham Salem, Hoda A Elkatan

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The global epidemiology of MRSA.JAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Methicillin-ResistantMicroorganisms · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Antimicrobial Resistance Characteristics ofInfection and drug resistance · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Molecular epidemiology of methicillin-resistantFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ahmed AzzamDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Helwan University, Cairo, Egypt. ahmed.abdelkareem@pharm.helwan.edu.eg.
Heba KhaledDepartment of Biochemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.
Heba Mohamed FayedDepartment of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, October 6 University, Cairo, Egypt.
Youssef MansourIntern doctor, Mansoura University Hospitals, Mansoura, Egypt.
Mariam EldalilDepartment of Public Health & Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.
Eslam ElshennawyDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Faculty of Medicine, Kafr El-Sheikh University, Kafr El-Sheikh, Egypt.
Haitham SalemFaculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.
Hoda A ElkatanDepartment of Pediatrics, Aboukir General Hospital, Alexandria, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMRSA represents a significant public health challenge, particularly in resource-constrained regions like Africa. A critical factor in its spread is the role of asymptomatic carriers, who not only facilitate transmission but also face a markedly higher risk of developing MRSA-related infections. Against this backdrop, the current meta-analysis provides a comprehensive evaluation of MRSA colonization rates, associated risk factors, and antibiotic resistance profiles across African populations.

methodsA comprehensive literature search was conducted across African Journals Online, African Index Medicus, PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, and Web of Science from January 1, 2014, to January 1, 2025. Eligible studies reported on MRSA colonization rates, associated risk factors, or antibiotic resistance patterns within African populations. Results were presented as pooled prevalence or risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals, employing a random-effects model in R software (meta package). A p-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The study followed the PRISMA guidelines throughout.

resultsSixty-nine studies with 23,484 participants from 16 African countries were included. Subgroup analyses identified Healthcare Workers and hospitalized patients as having the highest pooled prevalence at 13.6% and 12.9%, respectively. Conversely, lower prevalence rates were observed among healthy community residents and children, at 4.1% and 4.7%, respectively. Among HCWs, Egypt reported the highest MRSA colonization rate at 18.1%. Key risk factors for MRSA colonization include a history of hospitalization (RR: 2.2), prior antibiotic use (RR: 1.4), diabetes mellitus (RR: 4.4), HIV with CD4 < 200 cells/µL (RR: 2.8), invasive procedures (RR: 4.8), and being a nurse compared to a physician (RR: 1.8), all with p < 0.05. Antibiotic resistance of MRSA was low for linezolid (2.7%) and vancomycin (5.9%), but higher for mupirocin (10.7%), clindamycin (23.6%), and Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (38.9%).

conclusionMRSA colonization is a significant public health challenge in Africa, particularly among healthcare workers and hospitalized patients. Implementing targeted interventions for these high-risk groups can effectively reduce MRSA transmission and overall infection burden. Continuous monitoring is essential, especially given the resistance to mupirocin, a key antibiotic used for MRSA decolonization.

Indexed as

Carrier StateMethicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusStaphylococcal InfectionsAfricaAnti-Bacterial AgentsHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsPrevalenceRisk FactorsAnti-Bacterial AgentsAfricaCarriageColonizationMeta-AnalysisMethicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureusMRSAResistance

Identifiers

PMID40217166
PMCPMC11987463

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.