Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40217149›Full record

ArticleBMC medical research methodology2025

Development and validation of a distributed representation model of Japanese high-dimensional administrative claims data for clinical epidemiology studies.

Hiroki Matsui, Kiyohide Fushimi, Hideo Yasunaga

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical research methodology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hiroki MatsuiDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology and Health Economics, School of Public Health, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, 1130033, Japan. ptmatsui-tky@umin.ac.jp.
Kiyohide FushimiDepartment of Health Policy and Informatics, Institute of Science Tokyo Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, 1-5-45 Yushima, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, 1138519, Japan.
Hideo YasunagaDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology and Health Economics, School of Public Health, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, 1130033, Japan.

Funding

the JSPS KAKENHI 21H03159the Ministry of Health, Labor, and Family Welfare, Japan, 23AA2003 and 24AA2006
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUnmeasured confounders pose challenges when observational data are analysed in comparative effectiveness studies. Integrating high-dimensional administrative claims data may help adjust for unmeasured confounders. We determined whether distributed representations can compress high-dimensional administrative claims data to adjust for unmeasured confounders.

methodUsing the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination (DPC) database from 1291 hospitals (between April 2018 and March 2020), we applied the word2vec algorithm to create distributed representations for all medical codes. We focused on patients with heart failure (HF) and simulated four risk-adjustment models: 1, no adjustment; 2, adjusting for previously reported confounders; 3, adjusting for the sum of distributed representation weights of administrative claims data on the day of hospitalisation (novel method); and 4, a combination of models 2 and 3. We re-evaluated a previous study on the effect of early rehabilitation in patients with HF and compared these risk-adjustment methods (models 1-4).

resultsDistributed representations were generated from the data of 15 998 963 in-patients, and 319 581 HF patients were identified. In the simulation study, Model 3 reduced the impact of unmeasured confounders and achieved better covariate balances than Model 1. Model 4 showed no increase in bias compared with the true model (Model 2) and was used as a reference model in the real-world application. When applied to a previous study, models 3 and 4 showed similar results.

conclusionDistributed representation can compress detailed administrative claims data and adjust for unmeasured confounders in comparative effectiveness studies.

Indexed as

Administrative Claims, HealthcareHeart FailureRisk AdjustmentAgedAlgorithmsComputer SimulationConfounding Factors, EpidemiologicDatabases, FactualFemaleHospitalizationHumansInsurance Claim ReviewJapanMaleMiddle AgedAdministrative claims dataDistributed representationHigh-dimensional propensity scoreUnmeasured confounderWord2vec

Identifiers

PMID40217149
PMCPMC11987422

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.